IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 9694 of 2010(J)
1. SEBASTIAN,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE REGIONAL EXECUTIVE
... Respondent
2. THE COMMISSIONER,
3. DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE INSURANCE
4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
For Petitioner :SRI.N.SASIDHARAN UNNITHAN
For Respondent :SRI.ASOK M.CHARIYAN, SC, KFWFB
The Hon'ble MR. Justice ANTONY DOMINIC
Dated :22/09/2010
O R D E R
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
W.P.(C) No. 9694 of 2010 J
```````````````````````````````````````````````````````
Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2010
J U D G M E N T
The diseased writ petitioner filed a claim before the first
respondent which is forwarded to the third respondent. In this writ
petition, what is sought for is a direction to the third respondent to
pass orders on his claim.
2. Though learned Government Pleader contended that,
the claim is inadmissible on merits, having regard to the facts of
the case, I think it appropriate that the third respondent shall take
a decision on the claim raised by the petitioner. This, the third
respondent shall do, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate,
within six weeks from the date of production of a copy of this
judgment.
3. Petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along
with a copy of the writ petition before the third respondent for
compliance.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
(ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE)
aks