Seetha vs Pankajkshy Amma on 14 September, 2007

       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

CRP No. 1188 of 2001()



1. SEETHA
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. PANKAJKSHY AMMA
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.MEETHIYAN KUNJU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE

 Dated :14/09/2007

 O R D E R
                         PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,J.
               - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                         C.R.P. No.1188 of 2001
                - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                      Dated: 14th September, 2007

                                   ORDER

This C.R.P. is remaining defective since 2001 on the reason that

service is not completed on the respondents. Under the impugned

order, the petitioners prayer for stay of the execution proceedings

was declined on the reason that the appellate court had not granted

stay. I do not find any infirmity about the view of the learned Munsiff.

Today there is no representation for the petitioners. In all probability,

the appeal is finally disposed of and the C.R.P. has become

infructuous. However, in the absence of the counsel for the

petitioners, the C.R.P. will stand dismissed only for default.

srd                                     PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, JUDGE