Central Information Commission
2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,
Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066
Website: www.cic.gov.in
Decision No.3366/IC(A)/2008
F. No.CIC/MA/A/2008/01158
Dated, the 30th September, 2008
Name of the Appellant: Sh. Sushil Kumar Rath
Name of the Public Authority: Department of Posts
i
Facts
:
1. The appellant did not avail of the opportunity of personal hearing on
29/9/2008. The appeal is, therefore, examined on merit.
2. The appellant has grievances relating to deduction of income tax at
source. In this context, he has sought for certain information in the form of
various queries. The CPIO has replied and furnished the information on the
basis of available records, with which the appellant is not satisfied. In his appeal
before the Commission, he has pleaded for providing correct and complete
information.
Decision:
3. The CPIO and the Appellate Authority have furnished a detailed point-wise
response and have thus tried to redress the grievances of the appellant. As
there are no provisions under the Act for redressal of grievances of employees of
i
“If you don’t ask, you don’t get.” – Mahatma Gandhi
1
the respondent, the appellant is advised to approach the Competent Authority,
which may do the needful in the matter.
4. The appeal is thus disposed of.
Sd/-
(Prof. M.M. Ansari)
Central Information Commissioner ii
Authenticated true copy:
(M.C. Sharma)
Assistant Registrar
Name & address of Parties:
1. Sh. Sushil Kumar Rath, ‘Gitabhavan’, At/Po Pottangi – 764 039, Koraput
District – Orissa
2. The CPIO & Sr. Supdnt. of Post Offices, Department of Posts, O/o the Sr.
Supdt. of Post Offices, Koraput Division, Jeypore (K) – 764 001.
3. Sh. Lalitendu Pradhan, Director Postal Services & AA, Department of
Posts, Berhampur Region, Berhampur – 760 001 (Orissa)
ii
“All men by nature desire to know.” – Aristotle
2