High Court Kerala High Court

Shahul Hameed @Shabul vs K.Ahamed And Another on 2 February, 2010

Kerala High Court
Shahul Hameed @Shabul vs K.Ahamed And Another on 2 February, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 237 of 2009()



1. SHAHUL HAMEED @SHABUL
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs

1. K.AHAMED AND ANOTHER
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.JACOB ABRAHAM

                For Respondent  :SRI.TITUS MANI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.N.KRISHNAN

 Dated :02/02/2010

 O R D E R
                       M.N. KRISHNAN, J
                       -------------------------
                    M.A.C.A.No.237 of 2009
                      --------------------------
             Dated this the 2nd day of February, 2010

                         J U D G M E N T

This is an appeal preferred against the award of the claims

tribunal in O.P.MV.No.1752/05. The claimant sustained injuries in

a road accident and the tribunal has awarded him a compensation

of Rs.3,000/- with 7.5% interest. Dissatisfied with the same, the

claimant come up in appeal for enhancement.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant, insurance

company and the owner.

3. The learned counsel for the appellant has made available

before me for perusal documents in the case. A perusal of the

wound certificate issued by Koya’s Hospital would reveal that he

was admitted with a lacerated would on the right foot 6x5x1 cm,

lacerated wound over the chin 2x1x0.5 cm and abrasion over the

right shin and forearm. He was initially treated as an inpatient

from 6.2.2005 to 9.2.2005. The discharge summary would reveal

that he was further admitted in the hospital on 23.2.2005. It is

seen that the radiological examination revealed a fracture on the

M.A.C.A.No.237/2009 2

tip of the lower end of fibula. He was asked to take three weeks

complete rest. Thereafter again he had been discharged on

25.2.2005. The total medical expense would come to Rs.1,785/-.

I proceed to determine the compensation as follows:

On account of fracture of fibula he would have been

prevented from work, I grant Rs.4,000/- towards loss of

amenities. Towards medical expense, I award Rs.1785/-, for six

days hospitalization I grant Rs.600/- as bystander expense.

Towards extra nourishment and transportation, I award Rs.500/-,

towards pain and suffering I grant a sum of Rs.5000/-, making a

total of Rs.11,885/- which is rounded as Rs.12,000/-. Already

Rs.3,000/- awarded. Additional compensation of Rs.9,000/- is

awarded.

4. In the result, M.A.C.A. is partly allowed and the

claimant is awarded Rs.9,000/- with 7% interest from the date of

petition till realization and the respondent, Insurance company is

directed to deposit the said amount within a period of 60 days

from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

(M.N. KRISHNAN, JUDGE)
sou.