High Court Kerala High Court

Shaji Joseph vs T.Balakrishnan on 11 June, 2008

Kerala High Court
Shaji Joseph vs T.Balakrishnan on 11 June, 2008
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C).No. 17348 of 2008(S)


1. SHAJI JOSEPH,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1.  T.BALAKRISHNAN,PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
                       ...       Respondent

2. S.MOHAN, DEPUTY  SECRETARY

3. AUGUSTINE, WORKS MANAGER, TRAVANCORE

4. D.B.RAM MOHAN, DIRECTOR, THE TRAVANCORE

5. VIJAYA MOHANAN, NOMINEE DIRECTOR,

6. G.JAYAPRAKASH, MANAGING DIRECTOR,

7. STATE OF KERALA,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.K.SHAJU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble the Chief Justice MR.H.L.DATTU
The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER

 Dated :11/06/2008

 O R D E R
                     H.L.DATTU, C.J. & A.K.BASHEER, J.
              ------------------------------------------------------------------
                           W.P.(C) No.17348 of 2008-S
                   -------------------------------------------------------
                     Dated, this the 11th day of June, 2008

                                      JUDGMENT

H.L.Dattu, C.J.

A public spirited citizen is before us in this writ petition filed

under Article 226 of the Constitution to direct respondents 1 to 6 not to sell

any movable or immovable properties from the Travancore Rayons

Company Ltd., Perumbavoor. Admittedly, the Travancore Rayons Company

Ltd was before the Board of Industrial & Financial Reconstruction (“BIFR”

for short) and the BIFR has passed orders and thereafter has referred the

matter to the Company Court to implement the orders made therein.

Accordingly, this Court has registered Company Petition No.14/2002. If for

any reason, the petitioner is of the view that during the pendency of the

company petition, the respondents are trying to sell the movable and

immovable properties of the sick Industrial Unit (Travancore Rayons

Company Ltd., Perumbavoor), he has liberty to make appropriate application

before the Company Court for appropriate reliefs. In that view of the matter,

we decline to entertain this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition requires

to be rejected and it is rejected.

Ordered accordingly.

(H.L.DATTU)
CHIEF JUSTICE

(A.K.BASHEER)
JUDGE

MS