Shaji @ Shaji Cheriyan vs District Collector on 1 August, 2007

0
31
Kerala High Court
Shaji @ Shaji Cheriyan vs District Collector on 1 August, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

WP(C) No. 21802 of 2007(U)


1. SHAJI @ SHAJI CHERIYAN, AGED 34 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, THRISSUR.
                       ...       Respondent

2. TAHSILDAR, TALAPPILLY TALUK,

3. VILLAGE OFFICER, KARUMATHRA VILLAGE,

4. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,

5. TALUK SURVEYOR, TALAPPILLY TALUK,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.SHOBY K.FRANCIS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice S.SIRI JAGAN

 Dated :01/08/2007

 O R D E R
                         S. SIRI JAGAN, J.
                      --------------------------
                   W.P.(C)NO.21802 OF 2007
                      -------------------------
          DATED THIS THE 1st DAY OF AUGUST, 2007

                             JUDGMENT

The petitioner challenges Ext.P19 notice by which the petitioner

has been directed to vacate the property mentioned therein. The

petitioner points out that the petitioner had earlier approached this

Court in which Ext.P18 judgment has been passed, whereby it was

observed that the 2nd respondent can evict the petitioner only after

issuing notice, affording opportunity of being heard including

opportunity to adduce evidence and passing a speaking order. The

petitioner complains that none of the above has been complied with,

while passing Ext.P19.

2. I have heard the learned Government pleader also. In

view of Ext.P18 judgment passed by me, I am satisfied that Ext.P19 is

unsustainable since the learned Government pleader is not able to

satisfy me that the procedure applicable as held in Ext.P18 judgment

has been complied with.

3. In the above circumstances, Ext.P19 is quashed. If the 2nd

respondent wishes to proceed further, he shall do so only after issuing

show cause notice to the petitioner inviting objections, granting an

W.P.(c)No.21802/07 2

opportunity to the petitioner of being heard which shall include

opportunity to adduce evidence also and passing a speaking order

dealing with each and every contention of the petitioner. The

petitioner shall not be evicted from the property till after seven days

of communication of the order so passed to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

S. SIRI JAGAN, JUDGE

Acd

W.P.(c)No.21802/07 3

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here