High Court Kerala High Court

Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009

Kerala High Court
Shaji vs Biju. P.G. on 27 July, 2009
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1467 of 2005()


1. SHAJI, S/O. THANKAPPANACHARY,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. BIJU. P.G., S/O. GOPALAN,
                       ...       Respondent

2. P.K. NAVAS, S/O. KASIN RAWTHER

3. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO.LTD.,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K)

                For Respondent  :SRI.M.A.GEORGE

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH
The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS

 Dated :27/07/2009

 O R D E R
                            K. M. JOSEPH &
                    M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.
               --------------------------------------------------
                 M.A.C.A.NO. 1467 OF 2005 C
              ---------------------------------------------------
                    Dated this the 27th July, 2009

                               JUDGMENT

K.M. Joseph, J.

Since insurance is admitted and counsel represents third

respondent Insurance Company, we dispense with service of

notice to the first respondent. Delay is condoned.

2. We take up the Appeal itself for hearing and dispense

with service of notice on the first respondent in the Appeal.

3. The Appeal was filed originally by the claimant in a

petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

Pending the Appeal, he passed away and the additional

appellants are his wife and two children. The Appeal relate to

the quantum of compensation.

4. We heard the learned counsel for the appellants and the

learned counsel appearing on behalf of the third respondent

Insurance Company.

MACA.NO.1467/05 C 2

5. As against the claim for Rs.9 Lakhs, the tribunal has

awarded a sum of Rs.3,74,469/=. Learned counsel for the

original claimant pointed out that the deceased was a carpenter,

aged 38 years. He would contend that the tribunal has awarded

only a sum of Rs.3,07,200/= towards permanent disability and

loss of earning power. This is done by the tribunal by taking 16

as the multiplier and the income at Rs.2,000/= per month. The

per centage of disability though certified under Ext.A14

Disability Certificate at 90 per cent, the tribunal has fixed

disability at 80 per cent. He would further point out that the

deceased was in hospital for 67 days and the tribunal has

awarded only a consolidated sum of Rs.25,000/= towards pain

and suffering and loss of amenities together. He lastly points

out that the tribunal has erred in awarding only 6 per cent

interest.

6. The first question to be considered is what is to be the

income. The accident took place in the year 1999. No doubt,

there is oral evidence of the original claimant and his vocation

MACA.NO.1467/05 C 3

was carpenter. But, having regard to the year of the accident

and the materials available on record, we are not inclined to

disturb the finding regarding the income. But, we see merit in

the contention of the appellants as regards the per centage of

disability. Apparently, the claimant, as a result of the injuries

became paraplegic. It is pointed out by the appellants that even

for meeting the call of the nature, assistance was required. This

means, having regard to the vocation and his age, it can be

safely taken that he was not in a position to continue to earn any

income. If that is so, we feel that the appellants are justified in

demanding that the per centage of disability should be enhanced

to 100 per cent. We do so. On this basic, the appellants would

be entitled to a sum of Rs.76,800/= more. Likewise, we also

feel that the appellants should be awarded, having regard to the

period of hospitalisation and the condition obtaining due to the

after-effects of the accident, a sum of Rs.15,000/= more under

the joint heads “pain and suffering and loss of amenities”. Thus,

the appellants are entitled to Rs.91,800/= which is rounded off

MACA.NO.1467/05 C 4

to Rs.92,000/= more. We also award interest at 7.5 per cent on

the amount already awarded and the amount which we award.

Accordingly, the Appeal is allowed in part and the appellants are

allowed to realise a sum of Rs.92,000/= more with 7.5 per cent

interest from the date of the petition till the date of realisation

from the third respondent. We also award interest at 7.5 per cent

instead of 6 per cent on the amount already awarded against the

third respondent from the date of the petition till the date of

realisation.

Sd/=
K.M. JOSEPH,
JUDGE

Sd/=
M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS,
JUDGE
kbk.

// True Copy //
PS to Judge