High Court Kerala High Court

Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 31 March, 2010

Kerala High Court
Shaji vs State Of Kerala on 31 March, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Crl.MC.No. 1116 of 2010()


1. SHAJI, AGED 34, S/O.OUSEPH
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA
                       ...       Respondent

2. K.A.POULOSE, AGED 57 YEARS

                For Petitioner  :SRI.A.RANJITH NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  :SMT.A.SIMI

The Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR

 Dated :31/03/2010

 O R D E R
             M.Sasidharan Nambiar, J.
            --------------------------
              Crl.M.C.No.1116 of 2010
            --------------------------

                       ORDER

Petitioner is the accused and second

respondent, the defacto complainant in C.C.No.

572/2007 on the file of Judicial First Class

Magistrate’s Court-IV, Kozhikode, taken cognizance

for the offences under Sections 468, 471 and 420 of

Indian Penal Code on Annexure-A1 final report.

Prosecution case is that after 31.10.2005, inducing

the second respondent to believe that a JCB

belonging to Gaylord Earth Movers, due to the loss

in the business the shop has been closed and the

JCB was entrusted to the petitioner for sale, made

the second respondent to purchase the same and

thereby committed the offences. This petition is

filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal

Procedure to quash the cognizance taken and the

case pending before the Magistrate contending that

the offences alleged against the petitioner are

CRMC 1116/10 2

purely personal in nature against the second

respondent and all the disputes were amicably

settled between the parties and consequent to the

settlement, it is not in the interest of justice to

continue the prosecution.

2. Second respondent appeared through a counsel

and filed an affidavit stating that entire disputes

were settled amicably and therefore, he has no

objection for quashing the proceedings.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the

petitioner, second respondent and learned Public

Prosecutor were heard.

4. The offences alleged against the petitioner

are purely personal in nature as is clear from

Annexure-A1 final report. Affidavit filed by the

second respondent establishes that entire disputes

with the petitioner were amicably settled. As held

by the Apex Court in Madan Mohan Abbot v. State of

Punjab (2008 (3) KLT 19) and Manoj Sharma v. State

(2008 (4) KLT 417), when all the disputes were

CRMC 1116/10 3

amicably settled between the parties, it is not in

the interest of justice to continue the

prosecution.

Petition is allowed. C.C.No.572/2007 on the

file of Judicial First Class Magistrate’s Court-IV,

Kozhikode is quashed.

31st March, 2010 (M.Sasidharan Nambiar, Judge)
tkv