IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
WP(C).No. 4279 of 2010(H)
1. SHAJIMON.S, PROPRIETOR,
... Petitioner
Vs
1. THE SALES TAX OFFICER, CHERTHALA.
... Respondent
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS),
3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR),
For Petitioner :SRI.V.P.SUKUMAR
For Respondent : No Appearance
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
Dated :11/02/2010
O R D E R
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
-----------------------------------------------
WP(C) No. 4279 of 2010
---------------------------------------
Dated, this the 11th day of February, 2010
J U D G M E N T
Challenging Ext.P1 order imposing penalty upon the petitioner, he
has filed Ext.P4 appeal along with a petition to condone the delay and
also Ext.P7 application for stay. Similarly, in respect of Ext.P2
assessment order and Ext.P3 order imposing the penalty, the petitioner
has preferred Exts.P5 and P6 appeals, along with Exts.P8 and P9
petitions for stay, which are also stated as pending. According to the
petitioner, it is without any regard to the pendency of the said
proceedings that the 3rd respondent has issued Exts.P10 and P11
notices under the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, which in turn are
sought to be intercepted in this Writ Petition.
2. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
3. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2nd
respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on
Exts.P7 to P9 petitions for stay and also in the I.A. stated as filed
seeking to condone the delay in filing Ext.P4 appeal in accordance with
law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within one month from the
date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. However it is made clear that
WP(C) No.4279/2010
2
till such appropriate orders are passed thereon, all further proceedings
pursuant to Exts.P10 and P11 shall be kept in abeyance.
The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly.
P. R. RAMACHANDRA MENON
JUDGE
dnc