IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18812 of 2011
Shakil
Versus
The State Of Bihar
----------------------------------
3 5.9.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner is also one of the
assailants of the deceased as well as of the
informant and one Motto Murmu.
Defence is that petitioner was armed
with Lathi and no such injury is found on the
person of the deceased as stated by one of the
injured in paragraph 67 of the case diary but
statement of informant is there in the F.I.R.
about petitioner’s having in possession of
sharp cut weapon, informant is also injured,
his father is dead. Co-injured is examined in
paragraph 67 what was its purpose known to the
I.O. but has created some doubt on his conduct,
in any case not doubting the prosecution case.
Having similar allegation co-accused
Abdul Mobin and Haji Abdul Quadir have been
refused bail by different Benches of this Court
vide Cr.Misc.No. 16995/2011 and Cr.Misc.No.
32877/2010.
Taking the facts into consideration,
the prayer for bail is rejected.
AI ( Mandhata Singh, J.)