IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.15874 of 2011 Shakti Pratap Singh & Harsh Singh Versus The State Of Bihar ----------------------------------
04. 15.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and
learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner, apprehends his arrest in
connection with Arrah Nawada P.S. Case No.
145/2010 for offences under section 420 of the Indian
Penal Code, is solitary named accused in this case with
allegation of taking Rs. 80,000/- in two installments
from the informant in the garb of getting him employed
in HDFC Bank. But, appointment letters handed over
to the informant was found fake.
Submission is that there is no material to
support the allegation. Moreover, under similarly
situated case petitioner has been granted privileged by
a Bench of this court vide order dated 22.07.2011
passed in Cr. Misc. No. 24221/2011.
Considering the facts and circumstances of
the case, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a
period of four weeks, let the above-named petitioner be
enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of sum of Rs.
10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the
like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial
Magistrate, Bhojpur at Arrah, in connection with Arrah
Nawada P.S. Case No. 145/2010, subject to condition
under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal
Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court
regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the
case, whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on
two consecutive dates, without any reasonable
explanation, the privilege granted shall be deemed to
Rajeev/ ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)