High Court Karnataka High Court

Shambaiah S S/O Mayasetty Gowda vs R Srinivas S/O Raghothama Setty on 16 October, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Shambaiah S S/O Mayasetty Gowda vs R Srinivas S/O Raghothama Setty on 16 October, 2008
Author: Ravi Malimath
....... . .........u KAHVATAKA I-IGH COIRT OF KAHQAIAKA HIGH COURF OF KAFNATAKA HIGH C

\II m-uwmunnn nsun \..s..rs_.n-u ur KAKNRIAKA HIGH COURT OF

E? TI-E I"-EGH CQURT OF K.fiRRATAKA AT BAKGMBBE

mmn THIS "mm 16%! my OF scream 200$  

BEFORE

am 1--Ion"3LE Mr. JUSTICE RAVI   A' k

S .S,
8;’ :0 Mayaaatty Gcawda,

A?-and 53 years,
1%.’ at Ru.’?6:;f 1,

Hanna ‘

(Sri T.A.I{arL1mh€ ,p.e%.vmm,

AND:

SIG

‘V 35-:a1’VsA, R] at’ A,
*.(‘:;ammr Ha&!,i;{3rokuJam lifl Smge,

pgyg.;;,¢.5:ae;§%o1:2%. ‘ …RESPOHDENT

1 R.D.R &M.N%h,
ahsaz¢]'”

.« ” ” * is filed under Sectinn 13 of Small Causm

‘ Act against the judwnnt dated 17.12200″?

-fgiafiaefi. in S.C.H¢.1-H04 an the file of the Judge, Court

T ‘ T :31’ Swazi Causes. Mysare, descreaim the suit far reeovezy
“egfrnrsney.

‘§%CW%;%*

by the %all Cans Judge, “it I

is than ms: 91’ the plaintrifl” that

ptaesmaimn cf the suit.

the dfifensiant, At the: me aIIiiit”s¢I1edxJle
pzrcqmty the d§m:uiaat::II In pay an
axmzmt est’ of the
mm-gage ‘that the aim.-e the
p2aintifi’ was
of the said amxmnt.

m Tr}-Sal cummx the juamus-. and deemeae.
aiufi :1; fin’ 121 mam {sf Rs.17,’?O0{-
at 5% par anmzul. A

AA Vgg.”I{aHIa1-d the learned counsel far the pe’I::t.m’ – W.

fa eounaaal is 913%.

HIGH COURT OF KARNATAXA HIGH ([205-._IRT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH C

:3aTm’£1-ia1C1a:urthasre1ied<mEx.P1na.me15r,tt1e_
dmui Hzxaci by the ciefierxdant vdaaz-a5n it '3

WA"

ruun uuunl ur nnmvninna mm u,u».;x: Ur KAKNATAKA HIGH COURT or I-(ARNATAKA men COURT or KARNATAKA HIGH COURT or-‘ KARNATAKA HIGH c

cmriy meztrxtfismed that a sum of Rs.15,000[- has

. Further cm: a sum cf m.s,mu;-
ragga an or berm 20.01.2001 and the
m.m,m:::;– within 3. pmtiod gr ‘

Exccpi dazying the signatures;

been made by the dfindazf
ciwuwt is cazwacted. the
‘§ria1 flmut zzarmat be reliance
placed an E»x.P3.« ..

‘in in the judgment
pvawafi % m was any mounds

Th: juémmt passed

rent.-waned and based an flu

sdl-%
I I “age

Ay-