High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Shambhu Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 June, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Shambhu Kumar Yadav vs The State Of Bihar & Ors on 27 June, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Cr.Misc. No.17671 of 2011
                   SHAMBHU KUMAR YADAV @ SHAMBHU KR. YADAV.
                                              Versus
                                THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS
                                            -----------

2. 27.06.2011. Heard the learned counsels for the

petitioner and the State.

The petitioner being the husband is

apprehending his arrest in a case registered

under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code

and Section 3/4 of the D. P. Act.

The accusation is of demand of motor

cycle and torture.

On instructions, learned counsel for

the petitioner submits that the petitioner

is ready to keep the informant as wife with

full dignity and honour. It appears from the

impugned order that reconciliation failed

before the learned court below. It is

submitted by the learned counsel for the

petitioner that the petitioner may be given

fresh chance for reconciliation.

In the circumstances, let the

petitioner, above named, be released on

provisional anticipatory bail for six months

in the event of arrest or surrender before

the learned court below within a period of
2

twelve weeks from today in connection with

Taraiya P.S. Case No. 19 of 2010 on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten

Thousand) with two sureties of the like

amount each to the satisfaction of the

learned C.J.M., Saran at Chapra, subject to

the conditions as laid down under Section

438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Let the learned court below issue

notice to the informant and on her

appearance the petitioner will take back the

informant to keep her as wife with full

dignity and honour.

The provisional bail of the

petitioner will be confirmed by the learned

court below in two eventualities if the

matrimonial harmony is restored

substantially within six months or the wife

deliberately refuses to reside with the

petitioner.

U. K.                                         ( Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)