High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Shambhu Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Shambhu Mahto vs The State Of Bihar on 13 September, 2011
                  IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Cr. Misc. No.30060 of 2011
                      Shambhu Mahto son of Shri Bhagwan Mahto
                                       Versus
                                 The State Of Bihar
                                      -----------

2/ 13.09.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the

offence under sections 406, 409/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Considering that the petitioner is in custody since

22.06.2011 and all the evidences have already been collected against

the petitioner and, therefore, charge sheet has been submitted against

him, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on

furnishing bail bond of Rs.5,000/- (five thousand) with two sureties

of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court

below to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran,

Chapra, in connection with Chapra Town P.S. Case No.91 of 2010,

subject to the conditions (i) That one of the bailors will be a close

relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving

genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner and another

bailor shall be the father of the petitioner. The bailors will undertake

to furnish information to the court about any change in the address

of the petitioner, (ii) That the bailors shall also state on affidavit that

they will inform the court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in

any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case

and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the

proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse, (iii)

That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the
2

police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for

charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial

in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of

misuse, and (iv) That the petitioner will be well represented on each

date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be

liable to be cancelled.

JA/-                                           (Anjana Prakash,J.)