High Court Karnataka High Court

Shamim Bhanu vs State Of Karnataka on 26 March, 2008

Karnataka High Court
Shamim Bhanu vs State Of Karnataka on 26 March, 2008
Author: N.Ananda
uuun: ur nnxlvntnnn I-nun LUUKAI  KAKNAIAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR

xx THE HIGH caunr 92 KnxNATnxA.Ar BANGALOEEVII,

nawzn mazs THE 25": may 59 MARCH 2eqE5Q3ff,:=

BE F033

EHE HOH'BLE HR.JUSTICE:$2,$R§$DAIIII*:III_I

£.’.RI…P. H0. 4e:’ae..f2oO”z;-._'” V

BETWEEN :

1

SH%HIH magma ~.} ; g»
are REHAMAEHULLA sHER1rB%-*;
AGED 34 rsAas.. %-u_=.’.u
RIG Na 5fl2,_HM$=£ad: Ij; fiVV x2 :
STH CRQ5S,”GaH$fifiAGARK ,1-I ‘””

aAHenLaRE+32j»T”2_

REHBMATHfiLL$;SHER1FE”=
330 LfifE_SHEIKH_HEK$EDQfi.

AGED §§_YflAR£ faV<_',I,
310 E6 5$2,»HM? E3303?'
5TH cEDSs;rGANG&NE$AE"

_ amgaggzaag-32’I» 1/

‘;V’ggu$RAIéB$fiEV
I<wioIHH35a:H_xamJI

§fi£fiH33M$EERS£
230 H HQ Efifléé, ywn QUAREERS

;II_ KfiH§LBERAEARDRA
I¥,_VBAHGfiiQR3*32

VbB,H§5SAIN KHAJI
. g5§D'L§TE MDHAHHED sag
«_'A&%n as ymnas
»_"x:o K as 32-44, ywn QEARTERS
j'KA§ELBERfiSENflRE

B.F§I'¥G?sIxDRE -3 3

uuufll ur RAKNAIARR HIUH (..'UUR{ KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR'

as 3339 $1-zzmm mam
sic: sssm mam;

mm =50 mans
3.5:: mm 25, FJLCE-E&1£1~ID ROD
Bmsazms-25

{By 3:31: 1-: 3 RAJENRA 9nAsm”z§gsfrs.O”-2 .
AND :

1 swam ma I<.?£RI*&'1F.–I€A V. .,
mscmz. @423 :–.?<:::;r.:~2 's'r'z~.'rm;q,i'
nweazams ~
BY rrs arm-maevmma "

2 zercm. ,
we as-32:331. _
AGED 28′-EEARS’ V ”

are Na 1′:r,,M %:.-=Vz~::.I1~¢,, »5′:*;q mass
LII: c::::.,om”,~ V:z:r.fsm;a~»::is:’ EAST

Jafafimm ‘

“-EAR:-means

. . . RESPDNBENTS

‘7f’—wvt»zay s:’i._,-Jr-1.’. .ffi$ xA2PA. I-ICGP FOR 111:

S M 513?. FGR R2 J

VVVFILEE 2:13.482 5 493 c:a.p.c 3*: TI-E

jzaa TI-I13 pmxwxcmzns PRAYITNG tzmcrr THIS
z;cz*:«:A€m.;*2V cmmr MAY BE PLEASED am Q’B35n.S£I Tim ENTIRE

mmzsgmes IN €:.C.NG.1′?’?15/G4 5.1-H mm FILE 02′ THE

“O”‘VTf..1;I”‘4a+;’c.z~:.}I., B’LC2-RE.

TEES 3;”-RIu.PE’I’}Z”.’£’ICi!’3′ GQIIEG ON {UR Iflfhb IXEAREVG
‘I’i’II3 HEY, ‘£’HE COURT HADE THE YULXUWING:

……….. V. Iv-u\|1r\IrIl\r-I ruvn uxlufltf |\I-IKNAIAIKA I-HUI-1 COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HSGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR

08133

when matter is takan up far: le;;”a1″:4r;;é«ci.w.4’i
azrzuuzmael far second reagau-dent :v’J£§?éOii1:£

trial cafi are zm.1’z’z15;2oo4 1,5 ~ ‘~

-:::::3..pe:titi¢n :’..$ filed ta: tlie’.;§}:aa;fi*g;Qfl§§h€tet
submitted in ac Ha. 1*?’:”F3.’_1’zf1?’I§f5’e3V’L.:i §L1fi§5;«;9v«§i§}V’AOéiipy of
charga sheet is not file?’ fV§ei~*;::1’£’OO–OE;%f;§__tition.

2. The -of petiticaners
and féiiiii-Véiaiwa:

Lfinccuseii-.ur’i::«.i is the husband of
second regyonzjifiénfiv.~.?eif:i.i§i$nar 1165.1 and 2 are the
pfliénts if:iI’fit sag:-Odfiééd. Petitioners 3 and 4 are

the 5.i$.t’§zg}f.»é;;n¥4l;ié§e of first accused. Petitioner

7_1i:1c:v_.5 is .fr;hea ,h:§§:.hsr-in-law cf second petitioner.

an cansidsaration of dcscuments filed

i::.*i:;:’.:9–:*,’:<_:v___§':3-ec'c:'.a:rx1 1'a'3{SI csf E'.'1:.I?.C., I am aatiafied

Viii4:..'}ai.tra:5:fnre-nts made therein would constitute caffences

élleged against the petitioners. As the trial is

. S
N 9,\.V-¢£x… .

IOURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COUR’lb’A_Oi’-‘..:KARNATAl(A HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

in progress it is nut prqper

matter in datail. Tharefaza there are no gr$fififi§Off*’O

to quash the praceadings. Rcccrding1y,_pat$fia$jis;O_ O

dismissed.

Pr!’

to discuss thaT4Oa