IN THE HIGH comm' OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALQRE DATED THIS THE 09'?" DAY or NOVEMBER Vv BEFORE _ i t in it THE HONBLE MR.JUs'rig1: N. "ii 4- _ V CRIMINAL PETI'I'ION 130.5244'? /Amie 4' f; to a it BETWEEN: Shankar S / o Chikkamadegowcia Aged about 27' Years , R/o No.70, 5* Main ' Kathriguppe East ' A p Barrashankari III Stage " vi . _ = Bangalore. ' V. _ 3 °...Petitioner [By Sri. B.D.Kiti's'im;ego\}irda, Advocavtei' = .. AND: 1 _ ::_ " » _ o - a State oftKari1ata'R;e1__by--S}I_O ' ChanoarnrriaI1aker5'e Aohu1_<attu.P.S. Bangalore City" * ' ' Reptd. 'my Govt'. Pieader-~ High Court 1:31. 1i1d'ingS = _ Bangalore Respondent ., _ (B-3} °sr:_.1rf3Misririivas--Ready, HCGP) * _ "i'}:1:is:ifje:titi.on is filed under section 439 Cr.P.C., praying " .to'.._en}.arge_ the-" petitioner on bail in Cr.No.221/2010 of Channarr:1':i_aiiakere Achukatu Police Station, Bangalore City, registered-.for an offence punishable under section 30403) IPC r/wgseotions 3 and 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. This petition coming on for orders this day, the Court =._r'n~adAe the foilowingz ' O R D E R
This is a successive bail petition, without there*«.hei.Vng
any change in the circumstances.
2. In Criminal Petition No.458o/.2010 deified–i1:i§2.oos.’:;01’eo,””
this Court has dismissed the bail”:.peti’t1o’n,
to the petitioner to file a fre_sh._bailA’aop1ica’tion:._before thee’
Sessions Court after chargesheet:_is.._»i’ilecl.’ ‘Accorclfingly, the
petitioner had, appro-ac’h_eciV_L it Court after
chargesheet waS*.«/filed:Aan£l_ has rejected
the bail is before this
Court.
3. fxhhavelh’earcl_:’the–~._lea,rnec1 counsel for petitioner and
lear1’le,d L3’P._\lfors State. V C C.
4. learned counsel for petitioner has not been able to
point ou’t’~van3,rV’vc’hange in the circumstances in favour of the
pelti-tiorier after chargesheet is filed. The law is fairly well
settledthat the Court while dealing with a successive bail
rm ,
petition cannot grant bail unless there are changed
circumstances in favour of the petitioner.
5. Therefore, petition is dismissed.
SNN