High Court Karnataka High Court

Shanmugam vs The Divisional Controller on 24 August, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shanmugam vs The Divisional Controller on 24 August, 2009
Author: H.G.Ramesh
W. P. NO. 1 931 442009
IN THE I'I!GH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 24"' DAY OF AUGUST 2009

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE  '  I 'T '

   

:<sR=_'fc. I 

Writ Petition No.19314 2909 L-.

BETWEEN:

SHANMUOAM
S/O AARMUOUM

AGE: ABOUT 45 YEARS

No.64, ANJANAPPA GARDEN _ 

3RD CROSS, NEW BINNY LAYOUT 

MYSORE ROAD   ._   g  _ I 'I 
BANGALORE » 560 048      .,.LPE'I'ITIONER

(BY MS.SADHANA,S--.L)ESAI EOR ..NEx'US,
ADvOcA'1'ES.?1  2  A. " 

KSRTC, K.H.ROAD_ .
CENTRAL DIVISION I .. 

THE DIVISIONAL  

 SHANTHINAGAR '  I
' 'RANO,ALO;_RE -.560 027" ****  ..RESPONBEN'I'

I'{BYVMS.H.'R.:RENV¥IKA, ADVOCATE.)

* . . 'THIS '\»"»'?IIj§I"If21=I:$E'I'I'I*:ON IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 8:
227 OF THE _c1ONS'm*U'I'ION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH

 --ANNEXLIRE§c' THE ORDER DATED 13.4.2009 PASSED IN
 I'.-»D.NO.46/V2005 ON THE FILE OF' III ADDITIONAL LABOUR
 - "COURT, BANGALORE, AND ALSO THE ORDER OF DISMISSAL

'  'DA';iED"'_«5.5.2o04 PASSED BY THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY

_ =I_N'INO.382/2004 VIDE ANNEXUREA, AS CONFIRMED BY THE

 _.__"'APPELLATE AUTHORITY ON 14.12.2004 IN APPEAL AUTHORITY
_ ORDER NO.128/2004 VIDE ANNEXUREI3.

THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY

HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE

FOLLOWING:



W2-

W.P.No.19314,g2009
O R D E R

This Writ petition is directed against the award

dated 13.04.2009 {Arinexure«C] passed by the

Additional Labour Court, Bangalore, in *

Dispute No.46/2005. By the impugned

Labour Court has rejected the

petitioner under Section of ._the_l

Disputes Act, 1947 as amended’i-ri:’Kar:iatal{a;’~i

2. I have heard the_1_.ea_rr.1ed_lAeeoulnselistlapearing for
the parties lithe’ award at

Annexui*–e«C.’ V V’

3. The as a driver with the

;-espvo«r51dler1t–K.S.R.’lf.__Q_.,, was subjected to a disciplinary

l’=_¢n;;;u:1V~y ..Qr;~.the’va\1legation that on 08.03.2003 when he

was (lriViri;_{jt;_}1’r;’: conductor~less bus from Bangalore to

‘.(;hennajI*he4had failed to issue ticket of Rs.165/– to

lpasseriger who was travelling from Bangalore to

and failed to collect the requisite fare from

lifhini and that he had failed to issue tickets of Rs. £65/~»–

§\
2a.?”/4/i’