Gujarat High Court High Court

Shantaben vs Fulabhai on 26 April, 2011

Gujarat High Court
Shantaben vs Fulabhai on 26 April, 2011
Author: B.M.Trivedi,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

CA/5129/2011	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

CIVIL
APPLICATION - FOR BRINGING HEIRS No. 5129 of 2011
 

In


 

CIVIL
REVISION APPLICATION No. 137 of 2002
 

=========================================================

 

SHANTABEN
WD/O DARUBHAI - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

FULABHAI
RANCHODBHAI PATEL [DELETED] & 2 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
MR
BS PATEL for
Petitioner(s) : 1, 1.2.1, 1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4,1.2.5  
None for
Respondent(s) : 1, 
MR RA PATEL for Respondent(s) : 2 -
3. 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MS.JUSTICE BELA TRIVEDI
		
	

 

Date
: 26/04/2011 

 

ORAL
ORDER

1. Rule.

Heard learned advocate Mr.Chirag B. Patel for Mr.B.S. Patel for the
applicants and learned advocate Mr.R.A. Patel for the opponents.

2. It
appears that opponent No.2-Bhailalbhai Ranchodbhai Patel has expired
as back as on 08.11.2005 and the present application for bringing his
heirs on record has been filed in April, 2011 and hence, there is
delay of about more than five years in presenting this application.
There is no satisfactory explanation coming forth from the applicants
for not filing the application for bringing heirs of opponent No.2
within the prescribed time limit. Since learned advocate Mr.R.A.
Patel appearing for the opponents and also for the proposed heirs of
opponent No.2 has no objection, if the delay is condoned and
abatement is set aside, the present application deserves to be
allowed.

3. Accordingly,
the delay caused in filing the application for bringing legal heirs
of opponent No.2 on record is condoned and the abatement qua original
opponent No.2 is set aside. Rule is made absolute accordingly.

4. However,
it is directed that since the main Civil Revision Application is
already listed on board for final hearing, the same shall be
proceeded further without seeking any further adjournment.

5. The
Civil Revision Application is fixed for hearing on 04.05.2011.

(BELA
TRIVEDI, J.)

Hitesh

   

Top