1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF' KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 215: DAY OF OCTOBER, 20:0 Q
BEFORE
THE HGNELE MRJUSTICE S..ABDU£;'NAZEEI§""
WRIT PETITION No.3I90I o'E2€i'IS:'(G1»I§RE;33"' A
BETWEEN:
1.
SHANTHA NURSING HOME
BY ITS SURGEON DRK B SIIEKAR "
AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS --_ v
DR SHANTHA W/O DRV_SII.EIiARfV
AGED ABOU_T'e1__6 YEARS" V. *
GYNEc0II5oG'ISfr* I -~~
BOTHEI R"/GVI, ,L"F{'RC5A_[:)i_ '
5TH CRGSS, i?;UF<GI_ GUDI A
SHI'MOG I '1; ' " PEIIIIONERS
(By: Sta ADV.)
i"HE.'cIaIEF ENGINEER
I'/IAEIGAILQRE DIVISION
I " ~ MESc<)M3 MANGALORE
' "'vSUPER;IN'I'iENDEN'r ENGINEER
A MESGQIII; SHIMOGGA
'I*'IIvE'1~KPTcI.
" BYITS CHIEF ENGINEER
I" "IIAVERI BHAVAN. BANGALORE
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
SHA AND NE DIVISION
MESCOM. SHIMOGA RESPONDENTS
[By Sri N.K.GUPTA, ADV.)
-2…
THIS VVRIT PE’FITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
22?’ OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PRAYING TO QUASH
IMPUNGED ORDER PASSED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT
ENGINEER MESCOM SHIMOGA DT. 18.6.2010 ATE »
REFUSING TO GIVE PERMISSION TO THE P_FjfI’it”I’I.OE\I_EI<I?_S
HOSPITAL TO INSTALL THE TRANSFORMER IN I\.–TIUNICIPAI;I'if'Y'–i
CONSERVANCY SI GIVE DIRECTION TO RESPONDEN'I"TO GIVE. K
PERMISSION TO PETITIOENR TO INSTALL THE 'I'RAN'SFOR1VIER
IN MUNICIPAL CONSERVANCY OR GIVE DIRECT-;CONNECTION"e
AS GIVEN BY MESCOM SHIMOGA :_AN.AND.APPA"S
MEDICAL CENTER & OATIIERS, \NI'I'HIN«_ 15 D13LYS~ _V\/',I'I'iIOU'I"g
CAUSING FURTHER DELAY ASVNQ OBJECTION ALSO VGIVEN BY
TOVVN MUNICIPALITY. SHIMOGVARAS PER V I
PETITONER TO PUT UP 1'RANsFo1%av_i£:R IN ITS. CON-SEVIANCY.
rms WRIT PE'r1iio:\i comm on FORGVVPREVLIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THECOURT P;gxssi:nviI'i'Ha; FOLLOWING:
Sri Ad:voca:te""is directed to take
notice forthee «. I
2fIn'*i.his' cpase}._th–eTpetitioners have called in question
the order at V_:An.nexii~re~?G passed by the 2*" respondent
reltisingi. to give peiniission to install transformer on the
lane adjacent to their property.
‘Learned Counsei for the petitioners contends that
I eD.r,K.BI;S¢hekar and his wife Dr.Shantha (petitioners herein)
‘established a nursing home (Shanthi Nursing Horne) at
” -“I..L.R.Road, 5″‘ Cross, Durgi Gudi, Shimoga. Their
application seeking power connection was rejected by the ZN
ii
R.
…3..,
respondent as they have sought for installation of the
transformer on the conservancy lane adjacent to
property. The 2″‘ respondent has opined that the .
ought to have provided space for inst2’tii:atti.r.j:t1’;p’Vot” ‘–th-‘3!
transformer and other infrastructures in 2*hteir–,1and’.- Fee1_ir;.gp
aggrieved, the petitioners filed ua writ.V_petition’v’d’be.fore
Court in W.P.No.11698/2010. oouft—b:y’erdVer dated
22.4.2010 directed the ‘._2~;1d y.esp.efideng.,.¢Q reconsider the
matter by taking into accpotxntythe pperrr1ission’.V=granted by the
City MuniCipat’ityA;;1jy~r.ShiIr5.0ga “ashpert-“Annexure–B. The 2*”
respondent the sarne as per the order at
Annexui_re–G._A3n . _’
4_t._; h’aveehe’arfd.p<tne learned Counsel for the parties.
5. ‘It_ ‘is 01Vear..A’fr_orny”‘the order of this Court in
w.P.Ne.-iisgs’/201’0″‘ dated 22.4.2010 that the 2nd
. “respondent to consider the application of the petitioners
.tai{i.n§=.j«r1’t0fevotlsideration the permission granted by the
City»!Munieipaiity, Shirnoga as per communication at
T3”-‘«.___V’Annextire_e313 dated 3.4.2009. Perusal of the impugned order
y