IN THE HIGH COLYRT OF' KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BEIICH 3.1' GULBARGA
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF DEcEMBERV_u:%ǤQ'sA.J.::' _ 3
BEFORE}
TI-{E I-!0N'BI.-E MR. JUBTIQE 3. Lawn xg2;§:{EfR" V
wan' mrznox H0. 4o5«4g12oo8'-;g__P;s§::1
BETWEEN: '" V'
M] 3. Sharanbasaweshwar Tra{ie'3:*s7'
Through its Proprietor _ ' --
Chan'~¢ V "
Age: 28 yams; " * 4. . »
O-cc: Bu3fi1ETS$T' _v _ _
(By Srti. filadagbuéiéi,
AND: g 'V
'V W Eéalnataka
" =I)jepa,'1'"$:I_m:A;t1t._-Lrf Agxiculturai Marketing
(A1*r~«m %
. "Is/LS, Eifilding
"'4._Bat1;galo:"t:
Rtftpfihjg its }"}ireCmr
' 'The: Secxzttaxy
" _Agricultura3 Produce
Marketing Kmfommittfie
S11ztzhapw: Dist Gu;{b:3rg:3 RESPGNDEZNTS
Jay Szci, Mallikaljun --f
the Constitutian of India, praying to quash. the cancaflafimg
of the allotment of site allotted to the petifioncr 3
at A1mexure--!:i am} cite:-?. __
This Writ Petitiml cusming on for Qzfcie-.rs u
Court made the following;
GRDER
The saconé. respondent aliottéd V sit£::
No.14? mgasurzing 30′ X 3.20′ in fa§£nj,1* –u::_f péfifiofier as
per the erder at An13.eXuré*–..?i’ (_1Aai;c:d;_31.. ii); Thereafter,
a 1ease~c§;i1n–éa1::ffdecé1:’fVdatééifi.3.2068 was ext;-tented by the
End respeiident said site in favour of the
pefitionet. ‘I’31£’.”‘ ~fi1St.r¢spC»:1(ic€$it has cancelled 1111:: alletmfint
A sites Am1exure~B dated 17.04.2008.
§??¢’titi}:§:15r”1f1Qa s:V(:*aj1ed in questifln the said cazmellatiorl 91:16:
in t§:§s ié~%rit
.. ; L2.’ fhétze heard the leammd Caunsel for the yartiesw
The allotment of the afaresaid sits in faveur of that
~. j::ét£iioner is not in dispute. Similarly’, the fifxfifcflfiflil 9f
V a visage-cum-sale deed by the secaud mspmzdent in faveaur of
the }_3€’?iEi£)I;l£3’I” iii» 8.13:: not in dispute. Hawcvfir, the fast
E
2
‘M5.
“M1
an
respoadent has cancelled the allotment of the aforesait:1Ve:3ite_V_
as per its order at Annexure ‘B’. Learned Coun$e:i”‘fe?r_’
petitiener submits that petitioner was not iSSh’3£1.:’:§33i;[iI1w::8}}Y a
Show cause notice nor was it hearii in-..T1;t?:’ ma-itter :bei5a_reVV:., .«
eanceflatien of the allotment,0f__ tl1eV”:~§§,t€i in
perusal of the order at An11exure’V’VL’BE i:;.e1iee{:ee Show
cause notice was issued “r;.g:rr heard
before cancelling the egiiestion. E am
of the View that” have granted
an opperfilfiigy the petitjeaer befczre
cancelljsjig tiieeeeite
4. «lizéthe ies{1!:i:,Vpetitien succeeds and it is
V aecorcifiiiigly a11oixe’er;i§ The ereier at Annexure ‘B’ issued by
iesge-“ndent in so far as petiiioner is concerned is
}i’c:.1_’e”:Tis_’g.TAq1ie;3§;ee{V;vV”HeWever, liberty is reserved {(3 the firsi
_:res;3€i:1e1e:;.”t’ take appropriate ace’-an against the
fjetitienems for eaneellatien 0f the site ifi question in
eaeeerdanee with law. Ne casts.
3d/’ 1?
Iudgfi
Cs