IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.17576 of 2011
SHARWAN DASH, SON OF SUNDER DASH, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE
MADHAUL, P.S. SARAIYA, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
2. 16.6.2011. Heard learned counsel for the
petitioner and Shri Mani Madhukar, learned
Additional Public prosecutor.
The petitioner, who is in custody
in Saraiya P.S. Case No.93 of 2010 for the
offence under Sections 25 (1-b) a, 26, 35
of the Arms Act since the month of
May,2010, has prayed for grant of bail.
It was submitted by learned counsel
for the petitioner that petitioner has
sufficiently remained in jail and he was
falsely implicated. Learned Additional
Public Prosecutor has opposed the prayer
for bail. It was submitted that from the
order sheet itself, it is evident that
matter is pending for trial.
In view of nature of accusation and
period of custody, let the petitioner above
named be enlarged on bail on his furnishing
bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two
sureties of the like amount each to the
satisfaction of 5th Addl. Sessions Judge,
2
Muzaffarpur in Sessions Trial No.446 of
2010 arising out of Saraiya P.S. Case No.93
of 2010. One of the bailors should be close
relative of the petitioner and secondly, on
each and every date, during the trial, the
petitioner shall remain physically present,
failing which his bail bond shall stand
automatically cancelled.
However, in special exigency, the
petitioner can remain absent on a
particular date with prior permission of
the trial court.
N.H./ ( Rakesh Kumar,J.)