IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Cr.Misc. No.18463 of 2010
1. SHASHI DEVI, W/o Ram Pratap Ram.
2. Biru Kumar @ Guddu, S/o Ram Pratap Ram.
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR
-----------
04. 06.10.2010 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the
State.
The petitioners seek bail in a case instituted for
the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 302 and
120B of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 3 and 5 of
Explosive Substance Act and Sections 17 and 18 of
Cr.L.A. Act.
Considering the nature of allegations and five
persons lost their lives, I am not inclined to grant bail to
the petitioners. The prayer for bail is rejected. However,
they may renew their prayer for bail after framing of
charge.
It is made clear that the petitioners’ case shall
not be bifurcated for purposes of commitment or framing
of charge in case it is done the petitioners’ prayer for bail
shall not be considered.
(Anjana Prakash, J.)
Vikash/-