High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Shashi Kala Sharma vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 18 August, 2010

Patna High Court – Orders
Shashi Kala Sharma vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Ors on 18 August, 2010
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              MJC No.2435 of 2009
                     SHASHI KALA SHARMA WIFE OF SHRI SARYUG PRASAD
                     SHARMA, RESIDENT OF S.N. SINGH ROAD, MOHALLA-
                     KHANJARPUR, P.S. BARARI, DISTRICT-PETITIONER
                                  Versus
                     1. THE STATE OF BIHAR
                     2. MADAN MOHAN JHA, COMMISSIONER-CUM-SECRETARY
                         DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT
                         GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA.
                     3. M.P. KUMAR, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION,
                         BIHAR, PATNA.
                     4. ASHA SINHA, PRINCIPAL RAJKIYA BALIKA UCHCH
                         VIDALAYA, BHAGALPUR
                     5. PARVAWATI KUMARI, REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR,
                          BHAGALPUR ZONE BHAGALPUR
                         MADHUSUDAN PASWAN, DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER,
                         BHAGALPUR................................... OPP. PARTIES

5        18-8-2010

Pursuant to order passed on 11-8-2010, the Director,

Secondary Education, Bihar Patna, opposite party no.3 is personally

present in court along a banker’s cheque dated 16-8-2010 in favour of

Smt. Shashi Kala Sharma, the petitioner. That account payee cheque is

for Rs. 9,02,907/- ( rupees nine lakh two thousand nine hundred seven).

According to learned counsel for the petitioner the said amount of the

aforesaid cheque is towards arrears of salary of the petitioner which was

required to be paid under the orders of the writ court. According to

learned counsel for the State now the order of the writ court stands fully

complied with. Learned counsel for the petitioner has accepted the

aforesaid cheque for handing it over to the petitioner. In token of

having received the cheque he has signed in the margin of today’s order

sheet.

In view of aforesaid development this contempt petition is

disposed of.

Naresh                                              ( Shiva Kirti Singh, J.)
 2