Shashi @ Shashidhara vs State By Belur Police Station on 13 September, 2010

 , A_vBel1lfA:Ta1uko, Hassar:---District. '

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE

DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY or SEPTEMBER: zoti.

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR.JUS'fICE--N.ANAl\lDl!._ 3':  

CRIMENAL PETITION No.%3rg79/230 3 A. "  

BETWEEN:

Shashi @ Shashidhara  A
S/o.Narayana Swamy _ 
Aged about 23 years . '  ~
Kote, N.Nidagodu_ village~--v..:"V V   '_ 'V :
Belur Taiuk, Has_s'e:-n District.    2

% % ...PI-ETITIONER
(By Sri M1fvGi1r:shl,:".;,gd§.j_=  ~  3
AND:

State; by tBel1ir"»Poliee $tation
...RESPONDEN'l'

   Majage, HCGP)

"I'his:. Crl.P is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C

 .p1ts.},ring to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Cr.No.30/10

 '*of.Bel'ur P.S., Hassari District, which is registered for

_ __j_.the'offences punishable under Sections 143, 144. 147,

  A 148, 323, 324, 307 r/W. 149 of IPC and Section 3[1J[x)
 of'SC/ST (EBA) Act, 1989.

This petition coming on for orders this day, the
Court made the following:



ORDER

Petitioner is arrayed as accused
No.30/2010 registered for offences under.
Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 322,3, 3.2%’3O;7_r;.iiv’;”1fiQ1ci’

1pc and Section 3(1)(x) of SC./”ST tmjact, N

2. Heard the iearned.i’Coi_:1nseJ..fortdpetitioner and
the learned GoVernme–riit.e_’Plead’er been taken

through the_im?estigatior1′ i

3: and the eye witnesses
wou1d:Vv_reVeaxiVhthVat 4’petiti:on_ei’ had assaulted injured with
a club andiicaiisediyi to his head. The Wound

certificate wouid ‘reveal following injuries:

_ 1}’1oss”of conscious 4- vomiting +-

eye +
..3}V:QiIiu;1tipie lacerated wound over scalp
it ‘ + cut injuries to his left side forehead aspect
and upper eye lid 3 X 8 ems

5) h/0 cut injury to his right side cheek (2 X 2

i
X
ems.) gm. C§T.>£\ x£/~«~~r.Q,,\ , ,

‘ 6) Ct Scan R fronto temporal and 1eft_.__front

temporal — parietai scalp heamatoma. -f

4. Considering the nature of injuriesA4_:’s1,iffered ._

injured and nature of allegations. irrihade. “against

petitioner, I am of th’e,_ opiniofi that;.:eustodial_:7

interrogation of petitioner necessary’. for proper
investigation of theffea{se.;_w .’I’i’:__erefore, petition is

dismissed. _ V

nas._§ it