Shatrughan Prasad Pandey vs The State Of Bihar &Amp; Anr on 20 January, 2011

                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                          CR. WJC No.409 of 2009
               SHATRUGHAN PRASAD PANDEY SON OF SRI UMAKANT PANDEY,
               RESIDENT OF MOHALLA BAGMATI SITACHOWK, HAJIPUR, P.S.
               HAJIPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI
                                  Versus
               1.    THE STATE OF BIHAR
               2.    THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, VAISHALI
                               -----------

5 20.01.2011 Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and

the State.

Learned counsel for the State submits that on

perusal of the report received from the Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur it would appear that

cognizance has been taken and the case has been

transferred for trial, and as such, the prayer of the

petitioner for quashing of the F.I.R. does not survive.

Considering the submissions, since after

investigation charge sheet submitted, cognizance taken

and the matter is pending for trial, and as such, the

prayer of the petitioner for quashing of the F.I.R. does not

survive.

The writ application accordingly stands

disposed of.

Manish/- ( Shailesh Kumar Sinha,J.)