__ ANn,£x"
-1-
IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNATAKA AT BAN§A;fiRt$ *
DATED THIS THE 30"'£mX OF JANUARY€é009 ' "
PRESENT.~W»
THE HON'BLE MR.JUsT:cE;K,sé$£bHAR R§Q_V7"VT
Afi3=.
THE HON'BLE MR.JusT1c§ s{N;$AT2AwAgAyAfiA
M.?.A;~x&.2€9e52bc3§fiv;
BETWEEN
SHAZAEHI 4
W/O HABEEa' _ V --.»'a} »__
AGED 50, R/AT»MQ,53,<-'v ~_ ,
GGVENDAPPA-BLOCK§f3I"CROSS;"""
DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI_'g _ .'
BANGALGRE'~ 56O.G45=_'2
'QV"% '-_'u* "a_"' ... APPELLANT
{BY SR1 T.PRAKA$H, K.V.RAJU, ADvs.,)
"r i'. wJAi$CHHNDRAN 5/0 VENKATAPATHY
T'AGE9%3s£ KANTEERAVA srvnxo, MAIN ROAB
'*_9"*CRoss;"sARVo9AYANAGAR
A 'YESWAHTHAPUR
"zBAKGALGRE - 560 022
(DREVER 0? THE LORRY BG.NO.CNJ 3456)
"25 JAYACHANDRA S/O SUBRAMANYAM
=-.AGED 3?, R/AT fiG.261
TRIVENI ROAB, GOKUL,
IST STAGE,II FHASE
BANGALORE » 560 054
(DREVER OF THE LORRY BG.NO.CNJ 3456)
3 THE'. NEW INDIA ASSURANCE C0 LTD
6%
NO.33!A, IIND FLOOR, IST STAGE
INDIRANAGAR, BANGALORE m 38 ;«. _*»
{INSGRANCE COM?ANY or THE LORRY ss".uv "
NO.CNJ 3456) r""°~'
4 AREEF S/O PYARU l_ :q(/
AGES 35, R10 GOVINDAPPA BLOCK;
DEVARAJEEVANAHALLI V ¢ 1 '
2mm caoss .j*, " _ v_ ;
BANGALORE w 560 045 (SRJVER OF=TH£"
AUTORICKSHAW BG_NO.CAKH3323£ "*
5 SALEEM S10 ABDUL KHABIR< '_LA _
AGED 45, R/AT v.Kg a;c;L.M;a}, g
324, waaagan ASSOCIATION, " ~x;'
No.6e8,,12TH_cEoss,j9:LLAmNA'GARDEN
BANGALORE'5=5so€o84'{DR1VER"a? THE
AUToRIcK3HAwqBG.yQ;cAH'3323}
6 TEE NATIGNAL INSURANCE CO'
BANGALGREVBIVISIONAL GFFICE
NQ.?2, 1::*FLoQR, ~.'
UNITy.BU:Lm:§G'A§&gx£
MISSION RoAm;.bANcALoRE ~ 2?
(INSURANCE COMPANY 09 AUTQRIKSHAW BG.
;NOkCAK 3323) '
. .....
'»uW/Q*LA$E B M VENKATESH
V. aQ;1o4,aBaNN:GANAHALLz VELLAGE
. ,DOORAVANINAGAR
'_ BANGALQRE ~ 560 016
'* 9 =" ... RESPONDENTS
«(ax SRI G NARAYANARAO, ADV., FOR R3,
“‘ SR1 R RAJAGOPALAN, ADV., FOR R6
R2~ SD. R1,4,5 & 7 DELETED)
‘THIS MFA ES FELED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT
R”vuaQ$INsT THE JUDGMENT AND AWERD DATEB: 30.9.2ao2
mssza IN we NO. 3055/1993 on THE FILE or THE’.
/MEMBER, MAcT., & xi ADDL. JUDGE, coma? 0? SMALL
CAUSES, MAYO HALL UNIT, BANGALORE, (SCCH.20},
Cg/,
PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAEM pE:’1′:’1*}….=:.>_1’x’a’».’:”.*
COMPENSATION mu SEEKING aNHANc__e~1_EN’T’~..e%_*—- .
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMENG or»: :g*o’§i’—oRpi:Rs.;.1:a.ié;y;”‘:
same: no 5., DELIVERED TH;~;_ FoLLow1r§G.; ‘
JU.. 9.._C%§;”?._?§3£§.’
The appellant~petitiQner wee a bafisenger in
an Autowrickshaw. A*ierry eeliified with the Auto
rickshaw. Ae e reeeitf t§§£F§titiener sustained
fracture efibg§fijeone%’Qf;rignteieq and 3″fl rib.
The petitieeer ie epegetee and implants are put.
The tdtal flee? disabiiity to be assessed at 10%.
The Trieunel hag ieundetnet the accident occurred
solely en aecefifit 5? the negligence of the lorry
fi&ri?er.V* The occurrence of accident, negligence
‘ef the ierry driver and coverage of insurance for
the _ierry Vgafi in dispute. The petitioner was
‘working as a vegetable vendor. His income to be
feseeeeed at Rs.1,500/- p.m. The income loss
“epreportienate to the disability is Rs.1S0/~ p.m.
2. Gm reassessment of the facts and
evidence, the petitioner is entitled to