High Court Kerala High Court

Sheeba K.P. vs United India Insurance Company … on 18 August, 2010

Kerala High Court
Sheeba K.P. vs United India Insurance Company … on 18 August, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

MACA.No. 1517 of 2010()


1. SHEEBA K.P., AGED 18 YEARS, D/O.
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SMT.CELINE JOSEPH

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice A.K.BASHEER
The Hon'ble MR. Justice P.Q.BARKATH ALI

 Dated :18/08/2010

 O R D E R
                          A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.
          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
              C.M.Appln.No.1905 OF 2010 in M.A.C.A.No.1517 OF 2010
          - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                             Dated this the 18th day of August 2010

                                                    ORDER

Basheer, J.

In this application filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, the prayer is

to condone the delay of 766 days in filing the appeal.

The impugned award was passed by the Tribunal on January 15, 2008. But

according to the petitioner/appellant, his father who had been conducting the

case before the Tribunal got injured due to an accidental fall. He was laid up for

a considerable period. But thereafter petitioner contacted his counsel who

advised him to file an appeal. The averments in the affidavit filed in support of

the application are totally sketchy, unconvincing and unsatisfactory. We have

also perused the impugned award. It is true that the petitioner had suffered a

fracture on left supra condylar region.

Considering the nature of the injury and the materials available on record,

the Tribunal, in our view, had awarded just and reasonable compensation.

Anyhow, since the explanation offered for condonation of delay is not at all

satisfactory, we are not inclined to condone the same. Therefore, the delay

petition is dismissed.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

jes

A.K.BASHEER & P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JJ.

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

M.A.C.A.No.1517 OF 2010

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

Dated this the 18th day of August 2010

JUDGMENT

Basheer, J.

In view of the dismissal of petition for condonation of delay, this MACA is

also dismissed.

A.K.BASHEER, JUDGE

P.Q.BARKATH ALI, JUDGE

jes