High Court Patna High Court - Orders

Sheo Pukar Ojha & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2011

Patna High Court – Orders
Sheo Pukar Ojha & Ors. vs The State Of Bihar on 4 August, 2011
                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Cr.Misc. No.23294 of 2011
                      1. Sheo Pukar Ojha, son of late Ram Dayal Ojha.
                      2. Bablu Ojha, @ Gyan Prakash Ojha, son of Rajendra Ojha.
                      3. Shree Narayan Ojha, @ Sheo Narayan Ojha, son of Sheojee
                         Ojha.
                      4. Tej Narayan Ojha son of late Ram Bihari ojha, all resident of
                         village-Kharahatar, P.S. simri, Dsitrict-Buxar.
                                                 Versus
                                       The State Of Bihar .
                                               -----------

02. 04.08.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in

connection with Simari P.S. Case No. 30 of 2011 for the offence

under Sections 341, 323, 504, 420, 406 and 427 of the Indian Penal

Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Buxar.

The petitioners are named accused in this case instituted

on basis of complaint case no. 219 of 2011 which relates to some

oral transaction between the parties for sale of a piece of land and

non-performance of their part of contract.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, in

the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of four weeks,

let the above named petitioners namely, Sheo Pukar Ojha, Bablu

Ojha @ Gyan Prakash Ojha, Shree Narayan Ojha@ shoe Narayan

Ojha and Tej Narayan Ojha be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

bond of sum of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) each with two

sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial

Magistrate, Buxar in connection with Simri P.S. Case no. 30 of

2011, subject to condition under section 438(2) of the code of

Criminal Procedure, and additional condition to attend the court
2

regularly at least for three years or till disposal of the case,

whichever is earlier and in the event of failure on two consecutive

dates, without any reasonable explanation, the privilege granted

shall be deemed to be cancelled.

Devendra                                        ( Akhilesh Chandra, J.)