High Court Kerala High Court

Shibu.O vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 14 December, 2007

Kerala High Court
Shibu.O vs Sub Inspector Of Police on 14 December, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 7736 of 2007()


1. SHIBU.O, S/O.RAGHAVAN NAIR, AGED
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
                       ...       Respondent

2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN

                For Respondent  :PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :14/12/2007

 O R D E R
                            R. BASANT, J.

              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
                       B.A. No. 7736 OF 2007
              ````````````````````````````````````````````````````
            Dated this the 14th day of December, 2007

                                O R D E R

Application for anticipatory bail. The petitioner

faces allegations for offences punishable, inter alia, under

Section 452 IPC. That is the only non-bailable offence

alleged. The petitioner is the 2nd accused. He is a friend of

the 1st accused. The 1st accused claims that he had married

the daughter of the de facto complainant. There is some

disputes in that matrimony. The allegation in this crime is that

the accused persons trespassed into the house of the de

facto complainant. Facts have been adverted to in detail in

the order dated 30.10.07 in B.A. No.6471/07. The 1st accused

was granted anticipatory bail by that order. The allegation

against the petitioner is only that he had accompanied the 1st

accused.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner prays, the

learned Public Prosecutor does not oppose the said prayer

BA.7736/07
: 2 :

and I am satisfied that in the facts and circumstances of the

case that identical directions under Section 438 Cr.P.C. can

be issued in favour of the petitioner herein also. This order

must be read in continuation of the order dated 30.10.07 and I

am not, hence, adverting to the facts in any greater detail in

this order.

3. In the result, this petition is allowed. Following

directions are issued under Section 438 Cr.P.C in favour of

the petitioner.

i) Petitioner shall surrender before the learned

Magistrate having jurisdiction at 11 a.m on 21.12.2007. He

shall be released on regular bail on condition that he executes

a bond for Rs.25,000/-(Rupees twenty five thousand only)

with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the

satisfaction of the learned Magistrate.

ii) The petitioner shall make himself available for

interrogation before the investigating officer between 10 a.m

and 3 p.m on 22.12.2007 and thereafter as and when directed

BA.7736/07
: 3 :

by the investigating officer in writing to do so.

(iii) If the petitioner does not appear before the learned

Magistrate as directed in clause (i), directions issued above

shall thereafter stand revoked and the police shall be at liberty

to arrest the petitioner and deal with him in accordance with

law, as if these directions were not issued at all.

(iv) If he were arrested prior to 21.12.2007, he shall be

released from custody on his executing a bond for

Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) without any

sureties, undertaking to appear before the learned Magistrate

on 21.12.2007.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
aks