High Court Kerala High Court

Shibu Varghese vs State Of Kerala on 5 January, 2010

Kerala High Court
Shibu Varghese vs State Of Kerala on 5 January, 2010
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 7592 of 2009()


1. SHIBU VARGHESE, AGED 42 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE
                       ...       Respondent

2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,

                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.HARIDAS

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice K.T.SANKARAN

 Dated :05/01/2010

 O R D E R
                         K.T.SANKARAN, J.
            ------------------------------------------------------
                     B.A. NO. 7592 OF 2009
            ------------------------------------------------------
            Dated this the 5th day of January, 2009


                               O R D E R

Apprehending arrest by the Sub Inspector of Police, Thiruvalla

Police Station or by any other police officer, on account of a crime

registered by Thiruvalla Police, on an accusation of having

committed non-bailable offence, the petitioner has filed this

application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure. In the Bail Application, it is stated that the

petitioner had business dealings with S.A.Sulaiman, Prabhath

Parameswaran and Reji V.Varghese while he was in U.A.E. When

the petitioner came to India in the month of July, 2009, they

threatened the petitioner that he would be implicated in a criminal

case. It is also stated that the petitioner was forced to sign certain

agreements at their instance. The petitioner apprehends that he will

be arrested on the basis of a petition filed by Sulaiman, Prabhath

Parameswaran and Reji Varghese or any one or more of them.

Learned Public Prosecutor submitted that no crime is

registered against the petitioner in the Thiruvalla Police Station and

B.A. NO. 7592 OF 2009

:: 2 ::

that there is no intention to arrest the petitioner. This submission is

recorded and the Bail Application is closed with liberty to the

petitioner to approach this Court as and when occasion arises.

(K.T.SANKARAN)
Judge

ahz/