Shiju vs State Of Kerala on 10 February, 2011

0
34
Kerala High Court
Shiju vs State Of Kerala on 10 February, 2011
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl..No. 935 of 2011()


1. SHIJU, AGED 33 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.  K.SIJU

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice V.RAMKUMAR

 Dated :10/02/2011

 O R D E R
                           V. RAMKUMAR, J.
               ....................................................
                 Bail Application No. 935 of 2011
               .....................................................
          Dated this the 10th day of February, 2011.

                                   ORDER

Petitioner, who is the 7th accused in Crime No.1597 of 2010

of Eravipuram Police Station for offences punishable under

Sections 406, 417, 420, 468 and 120(B) r/w Section 34 I.P.C and

Section 66 of Information Technology Act, seeks his enlargement

on bail. The occurrence took place on 12.10.2010. The

petitioner was arrested on 27.12.2010.

2. The learned Public Prosecutor opposed the application

contending inter alia that the petitioner was a candidate who

was prepared to pay more than `5 lakhs for getting selection for

the post of Sub Inspector of Police by underhand means and that

the investigation has revealed that the racket involving A1 to A3

and A8 to A10 for procuring employment to aspirants for

employment in public service, has been functioning from the year

2000 onwards and that nine cases have so far been detected

against them.

3. Having regard to the gravity of the offences, nature

of the allegations levelled against the petitioner, the relative

conduct of the parties, the extent of the injury sustained, the

B.A. No. 935/2011 : 2:

propensities of the petitioner, the sentiments of the large

majority of job seekers waiting in the queue and the other facts

and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that if the

petitioner is released on bail, he will definitely influence and

intimidate the prosecution witnesses. There is also the

likelihood of the petitioner making himself scarce and fleeing

from justice. I am, therefore, not inclined to grant bail to the

petitioner at this stage.

This petition is accordingly dismissed.

V. RAMKUMAR, JUDGE.

rv

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here