High Court Kerala High Court

Shiju vs State Of Kerala on 6 September, 2007

Kerala High Court
Shiju vs State Of Kerala on 6 September, 2007
       

  

  

 
 
  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

Bail Appl No. 5370 of 2007()


1. SHIJU, AGED 24 YEARS,
                      ...  Petitioner

                        Vs



1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY
                       ...       Respondent

                For Petitioner  :SRI.NAGARAJ NARAYANAN

                For Respondent  : No Appearance

The Hon'ble MR. Justice R.BASANT

 Dated :06/09/2007

 O R D E R
                             R.BASANT, J
                  = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                        B.A.No.5370 of 2007
                 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
               Dated this the 6th day of September, 2007

                              O R D E R

Application for regular bail. The petitioner faces allegations

for offences punishable, inter alia, under Section 302 read with

120(b) IPC. This is the third application for regular bail. Two

earlier applications were dismissed by this Court as per order

dated 3.8.07 in B.A.No.4652/2007 and 14.8.07 in

B.A.No.4990/2007. I have adverted the facts in detail in the said

orders. It is not hence necessary for me to advert to the facts in

detail in this order. Suffice it to say that this order must be read

in continuation of the two earlier orders referred above.

2. The alleged incident of murder took place on 10.5.07.

The petitioner was arrested on 28.06.07. He continues in

custody from that date. The crux of the allegations against the

petitioner is that he, as a conspirator had furnished information

to the other accused about the movement of the deceased to

enable them to mount the murderous attack on the

victim/deceased.

3. The application for bail is opposed by the learned Public

B.A.No.5370/07 2

Prosecutor. Investigation is not yet completed. In the light of the

contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is

no material to show that the petitioner had contumacious

intention, I had requested the learned Public Prosecutor to place

the case diary before me. I have considered the entire materials

once again. I have, in particular, been taken through the

Confession Statements of the principal accused as also the

petitioner herein. Other data available have also been considered.

There are indications to suggest that the petitioner had facilitated

the commission of the crime and had made efforts to locate the

deceased to trace his movements and to promptly convey the

same to the principal offenders to enable them to unleash the

murderous attack on the victim/deceased. Indications are there

also to suggest that the petitioner had an axe to grind against

the deceased. I shall not embark on a detailed discussion on

the acceptability of the allegations and the credibility of the data

collected. Suffice it to say that I am not persuaded to agree

that this is a fit case to grant regular bail to the petitioner at this

early stage. I am satisfied that the Investigators are

B.A.No.5370/07 3

certainly entitled to further time to complete the investigation.

4. In the result this application is dismissed. However, I

may hasten to observe that the petitioner shall be at liberty to

move this court or the sessions court for bail again at a later

stage of the investigation, not at any rate, prior to 20.09.07. The

Investigators shall, in the meantime, make every endeavour to

complete the investigation,.

(R.BASANT, JUDGE)
sj

//True Copy//
PA to Judge

B.A.No.5370/07 4