IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CWJC No.9517 of 2006
SHILA NATH MISHRA, S/o Late Shyam Kishore Mishra,
resident of Village-Sasaula Sabha, P.S. Majorganj, District-
Sitamarhi at present Incharge Headmaster Sarvodaya Gurukul
Sanskrit Uch Vidyalaya, Ram Ruch Nagar, Bargainia, Distt-
Sitamarhi.
.................................................................Petitioner.
Versus
1. BIHAR SANSKRIT SHIKSHA BOARD, Patna through its
Secretary.
2. The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shikha Board, Patna,
3. The Secretary, Bihar Sanskrit Shikaha Board, Patna,
4. The District Education Officer, Sitamarhi,
5. Ramphal Prasad Sahu, S/o name not known to the petitioner,
Assistant Teacher Sarvodaya Gurukul Sanskrit Uch
Vidyalaya, Ram Ruch Nagar, Bargainia District-Sitamarhi,
6. The State of Bihar,
7. The Deputy Director, (Secondary Education), Bihar, Patna.
.........................................................Respondents.
---------
For the Petitioner: Mr.Tara Nath Jha, Advocate.
For the State : Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC VII.
For the Board : Mr. Bijay Kr. Pandey, Advocate.
———
6 04.03.2011 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
submits that during the pendency of this writ application, the
Deputy Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna, has
passed the order as contained in Annexure-15 to the I.A.
No.2336 of 2008, whereby he has directed the respondent
No.5, to continue as Incharge Headmaster. However, it is
2
further submitted that the aforesaid order dated 28.03.2008
passed by the Deputy Director was stayed during the
pendency of this writ application and the petitioner continued
as Incharge Headmaster and in the meantime, respondent
No.5 has retired and, thereafter, the petitioner has been
appointed as regular Headmaster of the concerned school by
the Managing Committee vide its resolution dated
18.11.2008 , which has duly been approved by the Bihar
Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Patna on 13.02.2009, a copy of
which has been brought on record as Annexure 17 to the
supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the petitioner.
Therefore, the petitioner submits that no grievance remains to
be redressed.
In the above view of the matter, this writ
application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
( Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J)
Sanjay-II