-1-
IN THE maxi SOUR? OF KARHATAKA,
DATED THIS THE 191*! my 01? JUNE, 7}’ » x
BEFORE
THE HONBLE MR,JL¥S’I’ICE E;Aiv1 MQHAN i§EQ:)Y?
WRET PEPYFION No. 15129] (LB:-i?31}E}” %
BETWEEN
SHIVAJI RM?)
310 K, SQMLAJI RAD
AGEE ABOUT 52 YEARS V V
Rm BASAVANIXH-ALLI, .
PG: RAN(}ENM-EALLI
TQ:’F£:xf$Il{E’I°1’i.;., . , %
DIS’PRivCT’-CI-£lCi{‘§J§a5}G~AIL;Uf€—- ‘ ‘
= = 3 PEFFFIONER
_ 1, (BY vaavfixfima s PATIL ASSOCIATES)
V’ ., A. H ….. -A N
1 T T.'”rH_E g1i”x3’&I’I§.RNING OFFICER /
* ._ , &;w4:3B.:e*:3REs’r OFFICER
‘ M_UfiU_GODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH
mrmieonu, TQ: TAR}!-(ERR.
~~ms’r: CHICKMAGALUR.
A 5]” THE Munuzmmg GRAMA RANCEHAYAT
MUBUGOBU,
TQ: TARWERE,
mgr; cmcxmacmwn
BY ITS sscamanv
AMENDED AS PER CQLIRT ORDER
DATED 456.2008
. :J\;\
.2.
SR! DHANFAL:
S] 0 SR! THEFPANNA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS
R] O BASAVANAI”IALI,;I
LAKKAVALLI HGBLI
RANGENAHALLI POST
TARIKERE TALHK
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT ‘
SM1’. SARQJAMMA
W’/C} ADITHYAN
AGED ABOUT 45 Ymés
R ,1 O GANDHINAGAR ‘ ‘
LAKKAVALLI HOBLI
RAN(3ENAHALLi.__POS{I’ ” ‘
TARIKERE ?fAi.1II{
CI~!IKMA§§rAEL_Ili?._3)§S’F§§!§?P.._
sR1iEI.N, :1-J§;;:sm;;nAzA*r1e§V””‘-V__ .
3/0’32: 4NANq;agé9A’T» 4
AGED ABOUT 42 ~Y£’.AR$” ”
R10 RAN-CQENAHALLI’
mxmvmnz AHGBLI’
TARIKERE TAB-‘.J.I§____« .
” « C-HIKMAQALLIR DISFRIC!’
% _SRi gA?A!2£aM
– Asm SRIKARIYAPPA
50335330? 43 YEARS
RIO GANDHINAGAR
RAP€{}F;NAHALLi ms’?
AA TARIKERE TALUK
. _c:371KMAc;ALUR DISTRICT
SMT. saamsmzmssa
‘– W’/O MR, YOUSUF
FAGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
R] O RANGEi’iAIr-IALL1
LAKKAVALLI HOBLI
W
10
-3-
TARIKERE ‘I”ALUK
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT
SR} RAJU
3.0 SRI PONNUSWAMY
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS
mo VADDARADIBBA
RANGENAHALLI P031′
LAKKAVALLI 11031.1
TARIKERE TALUK
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT %
SMT. PARVATHAMMA. _
W/0 SR1′ MANJUNA’1’HP ,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEAR3,V V
R70 RANGE_’.NA_HALLI ” ‘ »
mKKAvALL:i;§§3B£1 . *
TARIKE-R133 f_1’i7’gI_.J.§K” _;
c:i::{isn2ac?;;«%1,I}£r;: ”
SMT, V;ASANTH:_?xKU!VI;&R§*
M0 331- RAMESH .– V .
AGED A300?’ ’40 ‘2?EE{RS
41:2 }’o.RAnG22rmHAL.Lx
.. nAz»;KAvALL1″Ha-sh:
“;’AS'<s1~:ERE TALUK
' f "Ci-H.K§w§}i€}'A1{UR nrsrzzrcrr
11".
“‘3R1V?2′”§Aj_§{§§§§H HAIKA
*~.s;<}' SR;I'I{RISHNA zwxa
Afififi ABOUT 40 YEARS
R10 BASAVANAHALLI
V. A' ' LAKKAVALLI HOBLI
* TFARHQERE TALUK
CEHIKMAGALUR DISTRIC-'f'
SR1B.V, MANJUNATH
s/:3 SR1 BEETAIAH
AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS
R10 VADDARADHIBBA .
W
-4-
LAKKAVALLI HOBLI
TARIKERE TALUK
CHIKMAGALUR DISTRICT
13 SMT, MEENAKSHAMMA
W10 SR! DQRESWAMY ; _
AGEI) mod? 49 YEARS
R! O INDIRANAGAR
RANGENAHALLI POST
LAKKAVALLJ H0512!
TARIKERE TALUK-..
CHIKMAGALIJR nlérizicr. .5
14 SIXATE 3:1,:-f;’c:’r:o1~:’ ‘{iéna{M’1.$sQ:’er«§ V’ ”
MARKE2M*1uc;-FEpERAT:oN B.13m_3;;s:G
CUN1§.}’Nf3-HAM:’–_R()AE)’ A ~ L
BANGALQR3. * p
,’ 1111 ~ 2 % RESPONDEINFFS
% ‘– (BYjs:§;R m£:%z§£QA$, AGA FOR R3,,
391 H. KANTHARIM, ‘ADVOCATE FOR 223-13,
SR1 “1=!:2A1;As;1 FI_EG..lZ§E K, ADVOCATE: FOR R2,
A. — SR1 K§N, “PHANINDRA, ADVOCATE FOR R14)
‘ C”‘i’H::s W325? Pfiffirimn IS FILED UNDER AR’I’I(3.LES 226
1§N’BV22t?'{}f?_’I’§{E c:9Ns*rmm0N 01:’ 12mm manna m
QUASH _ =,MEETIN.G NOTICE ANNEXURE :2 QT,
3..1G..:;oo*r« ISSUED BY THE R1.
“‘~’rH-is Pfirrrrlgw GQMING on FGR HEARING THIS
V pay, THE CQI..IR’!’ MADE ‘THE FOLLOWING:
Q__I.l_.9.§B
Izeamed Govt. Advocatt: submits that the relief
ufsough for in the writ pctifion is mndeztd infructuous by
passage of tixne. :_d§\
~-s./’
.5-
Recording the submission, the writ
azrcordirlgly rejtiactedk
111.