Shivakumar S/O Sri.Javarappa vs State Of Karnataka on 13 October, 2009

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT
BANGALORE h;OA

DATED THIS THE 13'1"" DAY OF OCTOB_E'R..';O_0§  

BEFOREM >

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HU1,UVAn1.C;;EAi\21Es:1 A

CRIMINA3, PETITVI_0-N' NO;~§-E65 Qfi_E2€):_Q_?;  

BETWEEN:

AGED 42 YEARS'-.  O 
R/OF HOUSE,VN§);A'1__292".   
14TH cROss,HTE&F3LOg:KTAA   '
RAMA.KR1SH_VNA1§IAGAR__E' "  
MYsc)RE_57ua23     %  PETITIONER

SHIVAKUMAR S/O SRI..I:AVAR;:APE3%\:~ \. 

(By sriX_M   

:$.1.'.{§I 

  KARNATAKA
  BVY"I{U\ZVEMP_U'NAGAR POLICE STATION
A MY_SORE"_CIT,Y'

 BY.  STATION HOUSE OFFICER  RESPONDENT

(By s:~aIéi0NNAPPA, HCGP)

THIS CRL.P FILED U/S.439 CR.P.C BY THE

ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT

A ~~-THIS HON’BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO ENLARGE

W’

I\.)

THE PETR, ON BAIL IN CRIME NO. 139/2009 OF
KUVEMPUNAGAR POLICE STATION, M,'{‘SORE,
PENDING ON THE FILE OF IST ADDL. IST CI\/_IL_iJ~UiD.GE
(JRDN) AND }UDICIAL MAGISTRATE AT

MYSORE, FOR THE OFFENCES P/U/S 366(B)~oRiRr:«a ARI)
SECS. 3, 4, 5, 6 OF PITA ACT AND sEC,,4s,,oRi,IND1AN,,
FORIENGERS ACT, AND SEC. ,6, :1 o’RRQi%”oR1:§.oN

REGISTRATION RULE, AND SEC. 1_2,oR 1″?A’SSPOR:1f__ACT’.

This Criminal Petition on” for ordersiithiiisi day, the

Court made the following-

Petitioneri”‘,h:as for::ig–rant…i:iof regular bail in

connectionii Ii,:3″9/O9ii’§oifi Kuvempunagar police,

Mysore, for tiieijiioffgehcesiiipiinishable under Sections 36603) of

RC and iSectionsii 3,A1,,ii5.,ii~’ii’6 of PITA Act and sec.14 of the

.,,_Act,iiii’i’9-46-.««’and Sections 6, 7 of the Foreigners

Rieg1istration4 and Section 12 of the Passport Act.

‘2,V__COn the allegation that this petitioner was running a

in the basement area of his house by bringing the girls

.,,_ffom Bangiadesh wherein the Ramakrishnanagar police have

3%,)’

arrested some of the girls and others, a case has been registered

against the petitioner.

3. Heard. –

4. As per the prosecutio–n_”version”–the=petitioner is the

owner of the house is _«invoived_.’iné commission of the

offences.

5. Aeeordiirig to :hei’1e[a;<n¢a' Counsel for the petitioner, he

is oniygthe owne1»i';;£ :ti1.e:vhr__)u'se which is unfinished and it was

being lookiieds after byi'the"s-Viatchman and he is not aware of the

i1Ie'ga1 acitivities béi1"rg"Ca1Tied out there and not connected with

_ the:_a1.1e"gved offenee.

tln View of the submission made by the learned

Counsel for the petitioner that it is an unfinished house and it

” ~»-was being looked after by the watchman and he is not invoived

W

in such illegal activity, petitioner has been considered for grant

of bail, subject to conditions.

7. Accordingly, petition 1:5″ alilowedt i>.=;;&tic1oy;}:ei_ :3}:

released on bail on his e,:-:ecuting._ 21* persolnalvi bond

Rs.50,0{){)/– and a surety for to thelsatifsfaction of
the concerned police, ct conditions:

(i) Petitioner :.Sl’1a:ll llava_i.lable to the

required.

iii}, A’ with the prosecution

‘ (iii)lE”«. his attendance on every Sunday

Abetyyeen—-‘l’0.00 am. and 5.00 pm. before

»vll’Ki1iifempunagar police until further orders.

sax»
JUDGE