IN THE HIGH COURT OF BANGALORE j V . DATED THIS THE 09" my 09 zéoé & BEFf?§E. ' ; .; * " THE HUMBLE MR. JUSTICE' MISCELLANEOUS F1233; APP'i§_z~§,4'N();$36 OF 2%9asaxmL_ ' BETWEEN: 1.
Shjvargé 1
Wfo ‘late: 4M;jR_ag1}uzzam, ._ K
Aged abgiut ” ‘
2.
330 ‘late M§Raghux:;a’fl1,”
Aged about 36 é
“Vidhga ;~_s;,suy,
Sfo iate M.Ragi1tknafl1,
Agfid 34 yeam
r R.Shetty,
Six: 1a:eAM.Raghunat11,
.. Aged about 32 years,
‘~ residing atMoo1ur village,
” Post Uchila, Udupi taluk. …APPELlANTS
Z (By Sri.Kish0re Shetty, Adv.)
A311:
1, United India Insurance C0. Ltct,
WV’
Ram Bhavan Compelx,
Kodialbaii, Mangalore.
2. Lokanath Snvama,
Sfo late Vishwanath,
Kargathai, Ulia,
Permannur post,
Mangalore.
(By Sn’.M.Arun Ponaaappa Adv t’;>r.1Ei’i.)
5::
This MFA. v{s”=fi1ed’ unde:”,_S¢’ction 173(1) of M.V.Ac1′
against the judgment ‘%and’~a§.::a1d 30.11.05 passed in
M.V.C.No.38~4,/03 on .f1ic 0f th;e-.P1’E’;£3~iviI Judge(Sr.Dr2) &
Add}. MACT;1Jdupi, mrr3:1y4al’3awiiIg,the claim petition for
compensatiim enhancement’ of compensation.
This aéimissinn this day, the Court
delivered the fdi!.9wi,ng:-». ‘ ”
“, JUSGMENT
“This vi..§uby the claimants seeking for enhancetnent
gi’vQo1np¢.=;n3at1:i;fu1aV being net satisfied with the awazd passed by
:he;fk%ci;§41%%«%%«5adge (S:-.Dn.) & Adda. MACT, Udupi in MVC
%N§.3$4/03- W
2. According to the claimants, on 27.3.03
Raghunath-M.She1ty was proceeding in his
bearing No.KA 20 M 1773 fi’o1i1:Ud.a19i ttovgaras ‘4?i§’a1iigai{.~re: to
When he reached the petrol i
Templeon N.H.17 a goods eanie V
in a rash and negligefit ..ii1annef dashed tothe”iambassador –
car due to the impact fatal injuries and
succumbed to during treatment on
the next wife and children of the
The matter was contested.
The ‘Ii’i£”ib1ir1alV issues for consideration having
heiidiitiiat fliei’aeeident:was due to the negligence on the part of
i :V’th_e 4oVf~-the goods vehicle in question awarded a total sum
” Being not satisfied with the same, the
clieimiixitsiiere before this Court.
Heard.
A373