Shivappa Basappa Meti vs The Asst Commissioner Dharwad At … on 3 June, 2008

IN 'f'3'~IE HIGH COURT OF KAEWATAKA AT BAEQGALORE WP,NO.24338 (E? 21305

-1-

IN THE HIGH CGURT OF KARNA ?Af(A A TBANGALORE
[EATER THIE THE SRB BAY 0!?' JUNE, ZCJOS
BE!'-'GEE

THE HQNELE MR. JUSTICE N.}§PA m% M *   % I    

wjzwe. 24338 05' 29353 {L'1_§_}. :  %   k
serwsam '  

1 S')?-§l¥i2§PPA BASAPPA MET}
FeGE§ ABGUT 46 YRS
QCC AGRQQULTURE
REA? §€¥fi:f\%8Q€'.'}R VELLACSE
TQ .5£\IB QEST BHARWAD

2 S&DQ§PPABASAPPfi.MET§  
AGE0A30u"r43yR--s   .    
«::c: A<3RiCULT€.?_RE  u 3 '  * 
R1A?MANS€}QRVvEi,§J'::3E§. '   "    .
TQ Am Q§ST*DHfi,RWAQ   '

3 Maaaagxzafipa BASAPPA 542253-. ,, 
AGED Aacxur 42:; '~:as'_  = '- ' '
occ; A<3R£C{§i..j'£}?.;E _ A
may M_AFéS{DQ¥é v:;.;..AG.:.*-:
TQ mafia 132$? mamagaa

I-=3 " MNG-AP?A'~BA$.s§PPA MET:
 Ae:§«ED z;m,J€~F<-.4» 
' % csztc 7r?s"3R'%f;UL.YL3&E 1.
"-fiéafif MANSGQR '1£i£;AGE
'31:': AND Qi$'§' -f}§~%fi.E:WAB
 .~ ~   PETITRDNERS

_ _T ~..{3g 3% 3 .2 Pusmisx $§D'€OCATE}

§ : -A:«:9  X 
  *2   T;.LéE:"a'é.s"r cemmgssamea DHAFZWAD AT maawam
 2:' -. ...ss%:R: oesnmwne ¥'£NAYA§< NARAVAN

 AGED MAJGR
' Rm c;Ao:~::<AR cmwz
rmaeaa DHARWAE3

'"3 RUSRAWA BASAPRA were

IN TEE HIGH COURT OF §iAR1'€.«'L'?AKA AT Bs3;'~I{},fiJ;ORE '§é,Pl'€0.2:§338 OF 20%



IE2' WE Iiliéii CC}URT Q? KARNATAKA 1%? BANGAL{'1.RE. "$:'.P.NO.34338 OF 2'-.{i{}5
-3.

occupancy flghfs in respect sf the !and bearing

R.S.£\1o.89l2 aniy is an extent ef 2 acres; 20 gunéas,

situaie at Atfikoiia viiaige Dharwad Distréct, under se<;?%£§;r:..4'_:"~.V_

77A af the Karnataka Land Refcerms Act, by   .

Form Ne. Zia mntending that their f3?her._V§'a$   

the said Sand as tenant and by oversigfi,   

file Form $30.7 for registratéan éf'«v.t§£:aupa hcy'r%.Q?étéIf T'he":

said appiicatian flied by. ';::e;,;tit§<:;r1'érg:,'vL.I":4"z:§''éai the Karnataka Appeiéate Vribunai,

 % %&%A«L%%$a:;%ga:m%% 'gm; N5. 1074z2m5. The said appea¥ had some

 :Jp" f§'m:'_fionséderatéran bafare the Karnataka Appefiiate

. "'i'"'«r;%"?;Vi_.3f':ai, Bangaicre, an fl' October 2005 and tha

;4;;§;::e!§ate Tribunai after ring the parties and after

 

12¢ '§"HE HEGH CEBU-RT OF KRRNATAKA AT BfiS'€GAi.OR§ 'J:-'.P,E\E{}.24333 {E}? 2()i)5



IN THE i~§§G.§~I CGURT OF KAR2\?ATAK.fi; AT Bfisl€GALGRE. 's¥.}3.l'\2O.24 338 GP 2095
-61*

censiciering the reievant records available an fife 

sonsonance with the reieuant prcvisions of  £_a%§c§L§"' 

Reforms Act and Rules, has dismissedfhe. éap pjVe5§.£" 

adméasion stage étsseff. Being aggv{ievéi5V_'t)§ ftir§e §£fg§p:g.ned 

arders passed by both the authc§rit§:é'3 as .§e'fe§rer€".=a§§§§?é; '

petitéeneys herein fett :ze::;a.s-:;s=;¥._'i£A_3te'ci'ia_:;"  théH§né %ar:t
writ petition. ' ' >

3. 5 have h 'eé':f;Td§: -"Ee§zn£:é"';céur§s;é:"-agipearing far

petitioners-«Sri.  evaéuatéan cf
the matedaaig   a:?§zV3V'VV'xE?*ze gmunds urged
by petit§onersA'én thév$ inciuding the srders
passed  " £§rst  ré$.;§:%fzd§nt%As$%stant Csmméssioner,

   Kamataka Appeiéate 'fribunai,

 8angTéE~3fé..,'viéé.".'A:é%éév§<ures--E and G respectéveéy, it is

vV"'{n'a:1V§Vfeest flan 4' face cf the orders that bath the

4:_a«1.:fc§'2Vz:§r§£§é$have net ccmmitted any array' or iiéegaléty as

  i}: rejacting the appfiaatiorz G? the petitieners. It is

V'fLV4j_"s£gu§éIfican£ ts mtg that, the specific ground urged by

_w_________,__,_.........

IN THE H.I{}§i COURT OF KARNATAKA A?' B:i¥G:'3sL{5RE 'v¥.P.]'€O.;2xi33S OF EGGS



EN TEE HIGH CCEURT OF Ké§RNATsE£§§; AT 35%;-QGALKFREIM W.§3'.?€€}.24338 Of' '.2905

-5-

petitioners in the instant writ petétéer: and aiso befere ¥he _ 

first respsndem'; is that the deceased father at' 

petitioners amid mi: fiie an appiicatéon in rs.==;s;_mi}e;f'ci.:AA;'T3:%"'.?:'u 

Sy_£\£a.89!2' to an extent sf 2 acres 2QJg7i3¥1:as;'.4's%tu%§ft;e§_;§§ ' 7' 

At%%ko%£a viflage and therefare, [Vi:heyA:"?3Aév_e  fi!eb ::2*.'v_ jF::c:»r:*rs'v 

N.?A stating that they are er;t§t£L::-éfi» far r駧$tré:ioE§;§ :3'?
eccupancy rights. it is   fiaid
greund taken by pe§i§§aner$A...%b§@§fit"§§é%E*:§w¥::gn:"a:":c§ the

submissaéan madg 1gaaEne€£"V.ocs;£nsé§ éiépearing fer

petiiianers   to be rejected
at threshotfi} ifaf  petitioners' father
Sri.Basap;;a  sé;-.*.£dent 62' Mansur has ffled
   re§§§{}§t¥cn of occupancy rights in

 numbers Le. sy.Nas.15z12, 103?

 8? be>i':;§»r'e':"'?:he Land Tribunaa Dharwad and which

4: . {§§r_n'; £133 gfanted eccupancy rights in his favaur ':0 an

 17 acres 23 guntas and when thefir father was

.    in fifirzg the appfication fer regésiiratiorz of sefiferai

Z:/~

IN 18%" Efiffzé-E CC3T.§RT QF KARNATAKA AT BANG51.I..€)R_E W,P.NO.fb¢i338 C7? 2965



_:ner%ts. " §}rde;'ed" é&§¢d'§ng§'3:_ « v

 'FEE HIGH COURT £3? KARNATAKA RT BMQGALCERE. W.?.NC'2.'2,=i333 OF '?;€}*35

-f...

convincing grourzda ts: aéisw the sad appeai and-'--.._b

therefcre; re}ected the apnea! fised by pet§t§<;n.i;é:;_-Eg' I  =.

upholding the erder passed by firgt respondent__§fj:~~:$..§i'aé:w  %

at’ the cegent and vafid reassn given fir?-s§f’vtés§¢gn§§en*tv%. :_’V _

as wefl as the Kamataka Ap§$g§–%§te “{{ib::ne%:’V”u’§a;

impugneé arders, § dc not__fir§d a{:§%VVVjj{;s*;%€§ca{ii3n: gizzad
gmunds to entertain {his §¥rE{.T*ipét_%t§’e’§re.” the writ

peiition med by pg:;2§g;nersA%;é%2§a%;::ej%t¢%be reggm as mis

sauce:-axed, séntié %$”hGth%’ng..v§u:_ § n”‘3b;:3e cf process ef

iaw. Tha: eVfz:’§e:’g?’ petitioners is

fiable to be¢;s:nssseékAasjn:égc.~me;m and fievoéd sf

3d/3
Iudgg’

EN “?1-‘LE KEGH CCEERT 45,)? K31R?’?sAT:~’§1~Z.%. EXII’ B§fi\EG.s%.E’.0RE \¥P.NC§,?.§333 OF ?.!’K3:’t