IN THE HIGH COURT 0!' KARNATMEA, BANGALORE ""'1'.'EB THIS TEE 334'} 113?.' OF APPJL 2005 BEFORE was anm'nLn nu. JUSTICE K.L.HANJUfi§TfiE ' "' w+n_Mn_1.n'mn OF znniffémgtti -: EETEIWI SHIVILPPA In urn-rr nu 3.:u .nn.uun:F}':. "!.'--.%'-'=..=n"'..I.'.:"..£"-..-.-.'..'*'.*.."v asmn nnour 65 rgans; i} _,f. occ;nUs1:Nz:a.s a AG-5l.It2'JL':E'IJB.E.,v'A».,. . P..!'J5I!I*:'-.-.1-.!~I..!.Ll.'!'.=.';I.,.....,_2 [. 5.8'0L'09%1'%V:' % re: a nxswgjnaanw ".f ;g.$PErIT1oNEn 1 was N3? xuninfaééunnncn co LTD .fiEVI3IONAh=QEEICE. nfizammn, 7 13:11'. 31: I'_1_'.'5 amuon nxvxaxozu-.1. . 'm.N.a,t-;3:'1:.,:" «szwr-nu ammn, '_*F.fiyfiQifigfiE3Efi3fi. 2 mmnanwflsn sxo snxuxnnarnn Danni .3553 i 'E~'EFuTOR, Ofifli BUSIEESS, ¥'~Ef0GURUW%RPET, xxwmun, = ._T.f;1LUK;Bm.ILEON(EhL, £11.51'; snganm, . . .. EEBPONDENT5 " L33 an X SURYJLNARAYAN RAG; ADV. FOR R1, R2 -* NOTICE DISPENSED WITH] 1:-nxs w.p rrnsn mmmn mu-:c:.n:s 226 my ' 227 on THE CONSTITUTION or man. To qunsn TEE IMPUGNED onnzn DI'. 13.9.2007 EXECUTION pmrzrrcm no.17o/aooo, maa:is:;:&tLti2si.'ttii run I MJDL. crvxr. JUDGE tsmmn am; nmmfm. VIBE ANNEKURE A JLI*ID~~vETC..'_: The pgtitipzigx ~ égggutigii '0 pr "eti'1:if:rz1 §:in;éi:y::a1%ciiv11 udqé. [sr.Dn], """ it the judgment and a.w$;.;.-ci--. him_ in M.V.C.685/95 "fi*1a.,_ " respondent:-insurance
V”c:otfig$&ny’*v..,4ha;£i.A:’d¢posited a sum or R.s.46.597/-
the partitions: filed :1
”’EE!’
an-nn. «aw.-f’~ nn1(In1’I a-I-“Inn mi-nfihn 1-‘I-uni’ -I 1′!
to the aforesaid amount. he is
‘ entitled to claim interest from July
iii-doe? amounting to Ra.13,600/-. He
/
~€–/
requested -the court to disburse the amount
;_~ .A_
1: the fasticicxfier. The 1” “”‘f’.__
resisted the prayer or the petitionggriV:’V$fi.:'”-..V
r\/ ‘V
the qround that them 1.9 n,a7″nr;vi§:y%jAh&hAh%ah£ *
:;:g1:;t;.:c;ct:. bgtwm-an the patitivbfieir
reapcandaant and that _pc:.’1.i :;*=. was}:
.py
in favour of the vehiclhéV.’.§gr1:iTchV”‘the
accident. Baaed oni.¢”_”tne”V:4 :§1″.Av,j\1e._-:1-»ut§.’i~a:-:13 the
-‘ .’.i
1″ xeagendenr V5.3-;5i;;1; hgns.
directed ‘thin Lfétitioxgér. hh*:ch.sshhta.n1ish thai”:
the ‘sea was duly
inauxec§r._Awith.VV”i::3i§::’15″‘.é:§h”espi:ndent on the date
cf. the aficitieniz. a-.-.d_f’..~::.*.3..1 then. the ax’-…-‘.”..1.nt.
v1.._-S o_:€:1e;fe:1%_ tnb” ‘ha._…1:opt in Fixed Beposit in
V”K§z§fihwt:ak§’ fhfiank or Koppadkeri Branch.
ordnr is called in question
«._m this *2.-eti tion.
1-!
W
M
fl
m
I!
«D
W
M
Q
M
15
M
D
O
1::
M
M
0
{H
IH
O
H
Vpfititioner and learned caunael for 1″
respondent.
{V
~__ ‘V
“Ga ‘
3. Aftur hearing this court has
judgment and award. The Tribunalw”fh’é$–,:””vv.,
directed the insurance company to H
the award. The insurance .;a;::a§-ar_aV;*5:V«’
‘if: have filarzi fiiis”f.fi3..1unEi’:’3’I.1E._ pa.’:;.i.t’i’:ag ”
which was dismissed by théfauurthheioug ix
it is .90, the ‘§§u’ast’i.u;i,;f’1..pf-.petitioner
ghigamhiihhihg thug i;Ag.11.§n.cu.V by the
‘ ,ésr$éc”:’v:_ 4. 515 ” i
“if
ha vehicle in
t
questing; #11. When once
the vi’ the Tribunal has
not be!-.m”h.._ i.’;.1,1..-.V£;e.=_1_*.”:«;’t2.1.a.Aé’i._:.5. hy the iuguxhhgg
<:prup_az1yV_i" and V "w-.vi;9_:1, such award. hue been
V".'aati:a–£ia¢i= the insurance company, the
exécutiug'.v'V'h?'j__§éé:§urt cannot go beyond the
' .. 'an 7…, F"
Co.’*’%CI’%%-av a..l”.’3 “u”$…; 9-PF-‘-aflh C’: 5119 J.99..II’..’.!§!.
1.9 contrary to the well-known
.’V:.V”*–“.§;_ihcip1¢a of Civil Procedure Code.
M
Therefore, the writ petition requires to
1…. -1 1- _.__I
DE fiJ.LDWUlilu
d_ T-rs 1-ha v~na1-I11-_ i-‘ha I.1v~’l~l- ‘l’\d.’:i”i1″{.I’\V!-«>,:”‘I~-._’IL”.I,
“I I uflulul ‘UH? &I?I’K&V’ TOO? “IInIfi\f 37″?!’
allowed. The order paea_et:i__
Addl.C:Lvil J’udge[B:t.Dn] s. ‘:J!1w;zVi’::j! V1._:é
1′-I.A.¢.’I’. dated 13″‘ Ju13¥% ‘1%999h’h1jnAmgcutica
Petition 1~.*o.1’m:2ceo is’,—–3$fé’z%e}”.~5.’ sé*:-..a,side.
The Executing Courtk”i_._a’ release
amount to the4*:§_§et1f§A1qh_er aubj act.
to the ixiw’ to be made