Gujarat High Court High Court

Shreeji vs Parmar on 13 May, 2010

Gujarat High Court
Shreeji vs Parmar on 13 May, 2010
Author: H.K.Rathod,&Nbsp;
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System 

  
  
    

 
 
    	      
         
	    
		   Print
				          

  


	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	 
	


 


	 

SCA/9393/2009	 2/ 2	ORDER 
 
 

	

 

IN
THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
 

 


 

SPECIAL
CIVIL APPLICATION No. 9393 of 2009
 

 
 
=========================================================

 

SHREEJI
POLYPLAST & 3 - Petitioner(s)
 

Versus
 

PARMAR
GANESHBHAI MITHABHAI & 8 - Respondent(s)
 

=========================================================
 
Appearance
: 
NANAVATI
ASSOCIATES for
Petitioner(s) : 1 - 4. 
MRPCCHAUDHARI for Respondent(s) : 1,
5, 
NOTICE UNSERVED for Respondent(s) : 2 - 4,6 - 8,8.2.2 - 9. 
None
for Respondent(s) :
8, 
=========================================================


 
	  
	 
	  
		 
			 

CORAM
			: 
			
		
		 
			 

HONOURABLE
			MR.JUSTICE H.K.RATHOD
		
	

 

 
 


 

Date
: 13/05/2010 

 

 
 
ORAL
ORDER

Heard
learned advocate Ms.Shamta Patel for Nanavati Associates appearing
on behalf of petitioner and learned advocate Mr.P.C.Chaudhary on
behalf of respondents. Petitioner has challenged the award and order
dated 06.03.2006 in Reference (LCA) No.1835 of 1995 and order dated
12.02.2008 in Miscellaneous Application No.173 of 2006.

Today,
when the matter is taken-up for hearing, both the learned advocates
placed on record a settlement, arrived between the parties, outside
the Court. The settlement, having annexure- A , where details
are given for payment to concerned respondent-workman. Settlement
is signed by both the learned advocates as well as by the petitioner
and concerned workman. It has been taken-up on record. Accordingly,
this petition is disposed of in terms of present settlement.

It
is accordingly directed to both the parties to abide by settlement.
Learned advocate Mr.Chaudhary appearing on behalf of respondent
Nos.1, 5 and 8 in whose favour award is passed by learned Labour
Court. He submitted that in respect to rest of respondents, learned
Labour Court has not passed any award; therefore, this settlement is
covered to respondent Nos.1, 5 and 8. Accordingly it has been
recorded.

(H.K.RATHOD,
J.)

..mitesh..

   

Top