Building Campus Office of
Prosecutors, Dharwad. …Responden”t–.»
(By Sri.Vinayak S Kulkarni, HCGP)’
This Criminal Petition is filed undVer”rS.ec_t’ioni T
439 Cr.P.C. seeking to grar:.’t””‘regi,1i’,ar_:.ifiieiliiiin
S.C.No.1S3/2010, pending on:nit1éiiei~’m’e.
Track and Additional Se’ssi.onsit’Court;’V”‘ii.;u1gke:’riVi
which is registered punisiiaime Section
302 R/W 34 of IPC.
This Crimi’i1.5_1l P;e’titio’«n s.¢m;ng.ttinn for orders
this (1 ay, th g QC adreu «fo’1Tow”i n g:
0RDERt
Peti’t,io’ner T’ =”and 2 herein are
respeivctiyeif ~.’3i§3C1i'{Se.C1 Nos} and 2 in Crime No.
iisii./izoiiioji fvpr isimeshwar Police Station
pending on the file of the
_ Fast.Tr.ac}{‘«:’*(§ourt, Hukkeri. They have sought for
under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. Their earlier
in Criminal Petition No.7519/2010 came
c~
DJ
to be dismissed by this Court for non~
prosecution.
2. These two petitioners-accuseydl’ax-El.W
alleged to have committed murdeif_””~o:fffoneiT’
Dundappa Appaji Inchanalefl
years, the husband; cornf:alairian:tt.”‘i V
Srrit.Kallavva.
3. On careful rfgiiahdiiiihgylxovf’4th’§;:Va’SJ_¢rments in
the both the
petitioners:’aoc.1i1sle–d’.a:5§.5:é’k$1_1′-ecl:l’._:’lh_ei”deceased with
“kurpi”Vviv{‘a”vsrnalllis;i=ekle«)–:ran’d*v-thiereby inflicted on
his person4:fatjallffir1je1ivri.e:’s’despite the complaint
reqL1es_ting'”‘~th’err12_ assault the deceased
§hatAheAV”‘w’a–s”aged person (more than 65
:VE’.:_:IV.1f’j,’V’.::V1’1′.;.: might die if assaulted PM
exainiinavtion;’izreport reveals that the Medical
i3V~’«.___Gfficer” y_\Aa*1~ho conducted PM examination noticed
dead body of the deceased incised
c_.-.f\”””‘””‘””
wounds over right hand, right foot, left foot,
near eyes and ears contusions over both the
shoulders and multiple small abrasionsfloivetirpriii’..,,
infront of chest, upper and lower limbs
the said injuries were antemoftezni’in7.natu_re_i._l’n”
the opinion of the Medical _Offiicer’,v. thepiciaijuse i’
death of the deceased waisyiclue of
liver.
4. Whepvthieri were
responsible of liver of
the his death is a
fact to prosecution at the
trial of the-«.Vcase;__ l35.1.irtiili’1er, it is not in dispute
“V’*t.hat~ifihe_Ddeceais’e’d-….w’as aged between 65 and 70
of his death.
flfiaving regard to the above facts and
ifii.cir’c’un1stiances of the case, I feel that both the
€_’,”‘–.:H\”””‘”””””‘