rm.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE
DATED THIS THE 10?" DAY OF AUGUST 2009
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR.P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF.1..US'TIC.E"
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. 3USTEC_E v.G,S'ABHAHiiP' " A
WRIT APPEAL NO. 2037/2.509 (G§V\'G'--R;ESV'}:
BETWEEN:
BAIRA POQEARY _
S/O TANI'¥APg.A-49qOQ'3ARY" "
PINTO C'GM«PG~U~i\:D »
LONG LANE, ;iJRVA' O_
MAN'G'A.LO'RE 3
O ~ ...APPELLANT
(By SH G RAVISHANK'AR.._SHASTRY, ADV.)
AND :
' EHE.DE,PU1Y"COMMISS1ONER
MA_¥\EGALQREf'f~_.~*
D. K': ' A "
V PUNEABENATIONAL BANK
BALMATA , MANGALORE,
REF'-._BY ITS DEPUTY GENERAL
gMANAGER
Q RESPONDENTS
.:(_’B*,:..S?i B VEERAPPA, AGA FOR R–1)
3
dismissed the same. There is a delay of 104 days in filing
the appeal and Misc.W.600S/O9 is filed seekifig
condonation thereof.
2. The appellant herein filed
Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution :hdila1s,eei;:;,{gVVll_t-e fisj
quash the notice/order dated I5′
respondent–Deputy Comrnissi,onalli_:” ‘VV”5’fl.angalore,…VE D.K.
Qistrict, directing the police_.’to” and take
physical possession: of It is the
contention of the tenant of
property 0.6 acres (6
cents) Pinto Compound, Bolur
Village, Mallrrguaiorel and continued to be in
.–re.pvosse’st:.ioEnA§ pl-le lflie-d..__a_nv application under Section 77A of
VlVtjhee.Vl<aryna,tal{a.,0l;and Reforms Act for grant of occupancy
rightis"'whic'hi~.V~iz»fa,s'granted vide order dated 28.9.2004 after
'due enquiry: One Bhaskar Salian created a bogus
lledjoculni-entlllin respect of the petition schedule property and
~.,_y.,,.,,lr'aya,1led loan from the 2"" respondent bank, and on
llvchonimitting default, the bank proceeded against him, by
K?
8
question of condonation of delay in filing. However,
dismissal of the appeal will not preclude the appella{1’é,:.:f0..
work out his remedy in accordance with law.
/”W
Chief Ilibftice M
:UDeE
Index: Yes/N30». . ‘I ‘l V
V . . ‘ . ‘/
‘ Q ’71
Web Hosvlt: Yes/kw’