Central Information Commission
2nd Floor, August Kranti Bhawan,
Bhikaji Cama Place, New Delhi - 110 066
Website: www.cic.gov.in
Decision No.5663/IC(A)/2010
F. No.CIC/MA/A/2010/000282
Dated, the 27th July, 2010
Name of the Appellant: Shri. Devinder Chaudhary
Name of the Public Authority: I.O.C.L.
Facts
: i
1. The appeal was heard in absence of the appellant on 27/7/2010.
2. In response to the RTI application for information relating to the
distributors’ commission and related queries, the CPIO has furnished a point-
wise response and provided the information, on the basis of available records.
Yet, the appellant is not satisfied. Hence, this appeal before the Commission.
Decision:
3. An information seeker is expected to ask for information as per section 2(f)
and (j) of the Act. The appellant is accordingly advised. As there is no denial of
information u/s 8(1) of the Act, the appellant is advised to seek inspection of the
relevant records so as to identify the relevant documents, which should be
furnished to him.
i
“If you don’t ask, you don’t get.” – Mahatma Gandhi
1
4. The appellant is accordingly advised and this appeal is thus disposed of.
Sd/-
(Prof. M.M. Ansari)
Central Information Commissionerii
Authenticated true copy:
(M.C. Sharma)
Deputy Registrar
Name & address of Parties:
1. Shri. Devinder Chaudhary, H. No.1347, Sector-21, Panchkula – 134 112.
2. Shri. P.K. Julka, CPIO, IOCL HO, Indian Oil Bhawan, G-9 Ali Yavar Jung
Marg, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051.
3. Shri. Gautam Datta, Appellate Authority, IOCL HO, Indian Oil Bhawan, G-
9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (E), Mumbai – 400 051.
ii
“All men by nature desire to know.” – Aristotle2
