1 EN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 03?"? DAY OF SEPTEMBER 20}O BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ARALE NAGA.R.Ag,':'_'s:4"V;~ CRIMINAL PETITION No.so3o/2o1'o._:: BETWEEN: Shri. Goudappa S/o Ningangoud'?-A Mudigoudar 'E _ Age: 46 years, Occ: Pvt.Se'ryice R/o Bhagyanagar, Ramad_urg.__ Dist: Belgaum. A Vi ....P"etitioner". (By Sri . R. H . Angadi , . The S"t,at'e of E ' R/by Po_1icse--, it " Navanaga: Eiubli it By its SPF, D_h'a'rwa.d. ...Respondent. (i--:%y Sri_.Vine1§sk s. Kulkarni, HCGP.) _ C..ifi.i'i1ina1 Petition is fiied under Section 43»8'iC1f.'P.;j_Ci seeking to direct the jurisdiction po1'ice.--__'en.«1'arge the petitioner in the event of arrest }in connection with APMC Navanagar, I-I1.1_b}.i"" Police Station Crime No.36/2009 be enlarged on bail, which is registered punishable 'under Section 363, 343 & 506 r/W 34 of IPC. ,..cv'"'"' This Criminal Petition coming on for orders this day, the Court made the following: ORDER
Petitioner herein who is aCcuse__c’¢?.
Crime No.36/2009 of NaVana»gVar’ POiViie’ie*:’.Stiatvion;_
Hubli, has sought for bail u;ii_’de_f’~$eeti_vori’V
Cr.P.C.
2. Stated in briie-ft’-.th.e case… the
prosecution as alleged inf7t’heittvV:e’0i’np}aint dated
O6.08.2009__.-::ifi.§._ed§:’ .iu”o’1_:1…_euV'”:«ii”arppa S/o
Basavantapip_a: 1:’ “~~.1fe4isi”den’t of I-Iaralkatti
Village, Belgaum District is as
under: – V
;’a}_On Q_€;.'()8.2009 at about 1.00 p.m.
A. co11i1Vj:’>’1’aint’s son Subhash
‘gte.1ep;hoI1ed to the complainant and
=.fto1’d_’h11n he was wrongfukky 1n
a»__roo1h in the showroom of the accused
N933 Ashok Pam at Hubii and that if
“Kthe complainant were not to give
t-‘Q!-sr”‘\..«-“”‘
L»)
property extract pertaining to the open___
site of the complainant to him,
said accused Ashok Patii and
other persons namely A1–Mudigo<':§:da'i'.xi'
and A2–Mahantesh wouid'-n«otT_:rewieiaseii
hin1(Subhash) from the seaiciiiiliiiacneo. it
b) On the next
went to the said
Ashok Patii at has-;.1b1s’ii evngiguiringiihiim
about his son and:th’e’:s’ai§.d_:V’fii,’§.h__d.k Patil
did not? repiy.
TherefV<5"r¢,5ithev i.<_3.<_?:I"x'.1..piaiiiantwiiedged his
c 0 In pliains too n" O «. V
of the above
aIIegations_ "Co'_;npiaint it could be seen
that._{the~ present_'pe,=;itioner, who is accused No.1
ishot _ai'1e'ge'd__to have committed any over act, in
\iv'ro.n.igfi.V1iiVi.'yf:.. confining the said Subhash. Besides
'this: offences are aiieged against the
V' "..fpetiit.ioner–accused, the offence under Section
'is punishable with maximum sentence of
:#__w§\-*'~«.._\_',
imprisonment for '7 years, the offence under
Section 343 of IPC punishable with maximum
imprisonment for 2 years and the 3"?
under Section 506 of IPC is punishtgibiaj%;3}i-xii»A*
maximum sentence of impris-o'nmen7t f_or"~9,
or fine inasmuch as, he is r"iot'~._alleg'ed'~tVo;
given to threat to the life-v..to'fV.sthe.v.said,lb_o$?;WH'ence it
the following: V
The present p.e'1;'ti"oh= Section
438 allowed. In the event of
his arrest—,_Vll the -__pe:_tii'tiloner shall be enlarged on
1_iish"i'uvrni'shing a self bond for Rs.
,TGO(3-/it-"lvaalioiig with one surety for the likesum
totthe sl.a'te:ii_sfaction of the police officer arresting
lghim andi. subject to conditions that:
it he shall cooperate with the 1.0.
during i ion of the case.
ii)
Mck/Pv
he shali not threaten the
prosecution witnesses nor shall
he tamper with the proseCutio1:_a…._Jj-‘V”:’2:W.”‘-
evidence.