Central Information Commission Judgements

Shri.Gourishankar vs Banking Division on 7 December, 2010

Central Information Commission
Shri.Gourishankar vs Banking Division on 7 December, 2010
                      Central Information Commission, New Delhi
                             File No.CIC/SM/A/2010/000730 & 765 
                   Right to Information Act­2005­Under Section  (19)




Date of hearing                         :                                 7 December 2010


Date of decision                        :                                 7 December 2010



Name of the Appellant                   :       Shri Anurag Mohan Rathore
                                                S/o. Sri Gauri Shanker,
                                                Opp. S D M Niwas, Ashok Nagar,
                                                Agra - 283 104.


Name of the Public Authority            :       CPIO, Shreyas Gramin Bank,
                                                Head Office, DIGGI Road,
                                                P B No. 35, Aligarh - 202 001.



        The Appellant was not present in spite of notice.

        On behalf of the Respondent, Shri Suresh Kumar was present.

Information Commissioner : Shri Satyananda Mishra

Decision Notice

Appeal allowed

Elements of the decision:

Section 8(1)(d) ­  CPIO is directed to provide information.  

2. We heard both these cases through video conferencing. The Appellant 

CIC/SM/A/2010/000730 & 765
was present in the Agra studio of the NIC. The Respondent was present in the 

Aligarh studio. We heard their submissions.

3. In   two   identical   applications,   the   Appellant   had   sought   a   number   of 

information   regarding   the   maintenance   allowance   paid   to   one   Shri   Gouri 

Shankar.   The   CPIO   had   refused   to   disclose   the   information   by   claiming 

exemption under Section 8(1) (d) of the Right to Information (RTI) Act. During 

the hearing, the Respondent submitted that the Appellant had not produced any 

evidence to show that he had the authorisation from his father for seeking such 

information. However, on carefully considering the facts of the case, we noted 

that there was nothing confidential about the information which the Appellant 

had   sought.   Information   about   the   amount   of   compensation   paid   to   the 

employee   of   any   public   authority   must   be   available   in   the   public   domain. 

Therefore, the Appellant is entitled to know the maintenance allowance being 

paid   to   this   particular   employee   irrespective   of   whether  he   is   his   father   or 

anyone else.

4. In   the   light  of   the   above,  we   now  direct  the   CPIO  to   provide  to   the 

Appellant within 10 working days from the receipt of this order the details of all 

payments made to the employee concerned by way of maintenance allowance 

from the beginning till the date of the RTI application, month­wise.

5. The appeals are disposed off accordingly.

6. Copies of this order be given free of cost to the parties.

CIC/SM/A/2010/000730 & 765
(Satyananda Mishra)
Information Commissioner

Authenticated true copy.  Additional copies of orders shall be supplied against 
application and payment of the charges prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of this 
Commission.

(Vijay Bhalla)
Assistant Registrar

CIC/SM/A/2010/000730 & 765