Posted On by &filed under High Court, Karnataka High Court.


Karnataka High Court
Shri H Lakshmaiah Reddy vs Shri L Venkatesh Reddy on 25 November, 2010
Author: V.Jagannathan
APPA REDDY PALYA.
INDIRANAGAR POST.
BANGALORE660 038.
 PETITIONE-RS

(By Sri V  , SENIOR COUNSEL FOR'  .

SR1 V ViSWANATH.}

AND:

SHR1 L VENKATESH REDDY.

S/O H LAKSHMAIAH REDDY,

AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, J   "   

R/AT NO.39/24, THIMMA REDDY ROAD. '   ' "

APPA REDDY PALYA, INDIRANAGAR POST, I I' '

BANGALORE660 038... -- -.    
' ._  "   RESPONDENT

(By Sri K  V A' 

   FILED UNDER ORDER 47
RULE 1 OECVPO',  THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT
 BE PLEASED TO REVIEW THE JUDGEMENT AND

  DEOREE I9AssED"ON'08/09/2010 IN R.S.A 1500/2009.

  _ 'THIS'vE%E?3TION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS

 .DAy, 'VI"HI;V. MADE THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

.0 This review petition is by the respondent in

0′ ”AVR.–SiA.NO.1500/09 and the prayer sought is to review

” ~ “the judgment rendered in the aforementioned RSA by

this court on 8.9.10.

%

k I

7
submission before the revenue authorities to see that

the property stands in the name of the plaintiff alone

and none else, I do not see any occasion to ”

judgment rendered earlier.

7. Though learned senior

Section E5 of the Hindu Sue_eession”Act, mf’vi¢w”of
acquisance on the part of defenddaniz, said
section cannot to ..V’a:ssiVstance of the

petitioners herein. ‘

Review pe_tition”la__<":'ks" merit and it is dismissed.

Sdl-§"_
'Judge

Dix"/r: d


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

24 queries in 0.163 seconds.