IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUET BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019
BEFORE
THE I-ION'BLE MRUUSTICE SUBHASH E~.A_DI'__'__T- "
WRIT PETITION NO.67'255/2009{LA¥I§ES}-,1 1' -- H
BETWEEN:
SRI HANAMANT, S /O RAMAPPA MALLAPUR,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, . I Y. '
R/AT MUTTALDINNI, TQ. BILAC-I,
DIST. BAGALKOTE. ' --- ,_ '
_ '~-......_.PETITIONER
(BY SR1 MRUTYUNJAY T'ATA.,I3A.NOI, ADV. )
AND:
1. THE,_SVPECIAI};L.AND._AC:QU'ISIT1VQ1§J OFFICER,
BILAGI, DIIST. B'ACALKQTE. _
2. THEGENER_AL.'MANA.G'F,R,_.
UPPER KRISHNA' PROLIECT,
NAVANAOAR, BAGALKOTE.
.- » '~ " * ...RESPONDENTS
~ (BY SMT K’; “VI]f_}¥_A7JATHI, AGA FOR RESPONDENT NO.I )
– ‘ 2..THISwRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND
‘ ,,’2’;:7. OE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE
._RE_SPON’D.ENT’S”” TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION OF THE
PETITIONER ‘DTD I8/8/2001 AND 22/9/2009 COPIES AS PER
ANNEXURE C AND D, AND PASS THE SUPPLEMENTARY AWARD
nIN__ FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER IN RESPECT OF THE 350
=M_AfNGO TREES STANDING UPON THE LAND OF THE
PETITIONER IN SY.NO.1}.9/I OF MUTTALDINNI VILLAGE, BILAGI
TALUKA, BAGALKOTE DISTRICT.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE EoLLowI.NG4;’s~.V_
ORDER ‘d *’
Smt K.Vidyavathi, learned Addition._aI_j~–(_}O¥ierhxrie1itxI
Advocate is directed to take notice :1
2. Petitioner has’ s_Qught._f0r u’th:e:’*.
respondents to considerVO4I””«.theV sppliedtioras dated
18/eta/zotosagga[22j<j9/2069 produced at Annexures
"C" I"D"; is that, though there is
o't)se'1"xI.atior1"vsI'ith' regard to the mango trees in the order
A his appiications for valuation of the same
_hasr1dt'_~vb_ee.;'1"eonsidered. He relies on the order passed
by this dam in Writ Petition No.30620/2008 dated 18th
I I 'A Mgrcii, 2009. g Egg
In View of the order passed by this Coti'1't, the
representations of the petitioner may be in
accordance with law.
Smt. K3/idyavathi is peiI=rnit_te’ri tor
appearance within four Wee_k’s.,_