Shri Haridas Nekkar vs The Management Of The Rr Memorial … on 9 July, 2008

A jjggy  for

1

nu um um: count or manna; Ax  é " * 
mun ms rm 913       «k
mm Harem um. mm-Ax  A $
um aomm: misc} 

nwmmu: A _   
Sfo S.Suh.banme"P31:k_l§w:,  

Aged about--.45 Years;  '    

PreUn'1versity'€',oE¢gc,. ' " 

'    Adv.)

  RR
A . Miflagaili.
 ?n'YSOR'E - 570 017.

 Rcpxescntedbyiiai-!on.Seci,
TH'. Ed I. S .|'
J.C.Pu1m,
 -

‘E

been ‘ ‘ at the thmshoid; pnznarily’ on the

writ ofoertioxari docs not lie to quash 9

management agafmst its employee.

3. We were mkcn through the» tp.

Para 4 thereof itapoméimt No.1 –
institut|on’ was admitted’ – by the Sm:

Government vide    of the order has
4. In     by the lcanwd counsel

for the 3,” ,1 1 would be :1 sm mm ‘ the

meaning of of India and thus would

._t_a See an 19% 3%

Slngh Junta Vs. comniulouex. amen

_r g ‘M L

” AA oounsei for respondent No.1 was no! abh to inflate

V’ is not being received by the xespondcnt No.1 —

. Institution. If that be so, t vmaukl have

control over the running of the said institution. Thus

aooondingtous, itoou]dbccovercdut1derA1’tick: l2ofthc

“E5