High Court Karnataka High Court

Shri Laxman Dasti vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2009

Karnataka High Court
Shri Laxman Dasti vs The State Of Karnataka on 16 February, 2009
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) And K.L.Manjunath
xx mm men covm on mnnarmm AT nmasgpifié  " 

DATED arms THE 16% DAY or FEnRuARY;'A<'2:ocj§V.  'A

PRESENT

mm HOFPBLE am. an. nxnmmxgiz, ézréfizr éysrzcfi  

TI-IE HOWBLE MR.JIJsTI(;E----!'§;'1-.3EA1€JUi*ZA'?.'I-I-'V:
WRIT PETITIQN NO. 241T13'--QF*;.29é3r;:;§?rz:s--P1L)

B€1;VV£i€I1:    .  V

Sm Laxman Dasti  1  H V "" "
Sfo Ramaxma Dash  

Aged 45 years, Prc:.::.~:i{f£-wit' . ~  
Hyderabad Karflataka Jé3::ap3::a"Sang1ia:'sha

Samithi, No.:,:--465)'C;_--;,_m.;1 Jajé'€._I:}}o¢k

Aiwan E Shahi Area; V'    " 

Gu1barga585 192' _ '   S  : Petitioner
(By Sri Hulfrfiipa f'I'.€I\'.'J¢V2:I',' Vfidvctivrafé)

AIf?.€i:'=

1.  
Repre$enis_,-_d; by «  __Se::c1'cta1y,

 V' Public Works Drijazjtmcnt
 Vialzasa Scindha, Bangalore 560 001

" ":2? 'I"«3"1 t.',-V Kg-nlatfiksa Public Service

2 5_('3a§:¢.In;ission. represented by its
'~ , S¥2'.¢:ctary;.-- Udyoga Soudha,
' '_3a;'1gaioi;c: 560 00: :Respo11{ients

.   V -- .( B!'\#"eerappa, Govt. Advocate for R. E)

 



Writ petition flied under Articles 226 8:. 227 of _..__the
Consfitution of India praying to quafih the press Notification

published by R2 in the Vijaya Kamataka Kannada Daiiy "d.;é;~:a¢d,_'

18.10.2007 which is placed at Ax:111exurc-F' etc,

This Writ petition coming up for     

day, the Court delivered the fo11ow1':ag:-   
A!.3..P.G....1*.%I' 1 A _
(Delivered by P.I3.Dit§a,k§1~a3V1','-C43,)' %  , V
The Kamataka Public    issued
notification for selection   42 posts of
Assistant Executive AE311gi311=;At::Y:=.:._  '%5'1xb}ic Works
Department,  .1.-atgvzzifl  'ii}1*;.1p 104 posts of

Assistant Exacufizrf: §£}1i;giné£:rs_VDiSri$i%311v1}§ V

2.  V  proposed to conduct
examination at  Bgngaloze, Dhaxwad, Guibarga
and   HoW€iv¢r,Vv__jj_:;_Vijaya Kamataka, Kannada Daily

d ai:_¢d  ;1{},2{}£}'? Commission notified that the examination

 woulgi~hé.-.ga1id£i(:tccii,"oiiiy at Bangaiore Cenfxe. Even in the Hall

 T:g tiVckets is§§uec1. t.<)'vif:u.: candidates, the KPSC proposed to conduct

 Vfifiiy at Bangalore and net in other thmc centres

  '[)I;ia:<a§9.d, Gulbarga and Mymrc.

 



3. Aiieging that the candidates fiom Hyderabad-K3i°:1:'atei{vVA

Area could not appear for the examination at  +-

petitioner has filed the above public interest }itig31;§o.i§:'_tl3t"'is'$1te u "

of a writ of certiorari qnashing the Frees 

by the 23$ respondent in the Vijagre. 

13.10.2097 and to direct the to the
notification for selection fixecufive
Engjneers–II)ivisio11 1 which wee to 104
posts and for aj” the xesponoient.

Commissions toi.    centres notified

earlier.

4. it is fiatttinv a}}. the candidates have been
igxfexmed. the that examination will be held at
Baegelore. o’§ii’..Veonsidereé opinion, the very fact that the

exafiLr;éfi_e«t1VV be conducted at the three places would

hot give”£..:.z1yv–._eé11;;§’e for public interest iifigation either to quash

W ficzfifieafiexi issued by the Commission or to issue a direction

:5 the examination at the four centres, as, admittedly,

Vvtheficandidatee have been duly inf-armed by their respective

Eéafi iickfif that Exaiiiiiééiiififi W333} ‘:36 tozzfizgaftéiigi :’;::..§3: aii

E–imzctt, we: Gm 330′: :33: 3:13′ g:’:::’:’m:.”} $9 mztazfiaéig €}3§S §.}fi§{i};’;%:s§'{“§’_A – ”

i’a<;rc:’:’%i1 7-

‘s
2

:’:.%<:f