§N THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT .BA:eQALo§_E- T' '
DATED THIS Tm; 13th DAY cg'I%71§:§v*E.§ea__BER _
PRESENT K V %
THE HON'B1:.E MR. RI).
THE HOWBLE _§(;§i;;.sA;3HAHiT
maw Af.éPE_AL= N0A;'i's_5 1§,q{1,;mYAp_pA _
AGED AB(}IjT_'f59 YEARS'
R/*0 no 595,' t3TH"£3ROSS
M100. _ LAYGUT H
_ -BANGAL_OREv476';- .API-"'ELLANT
)
% THE 's:.mTE op' KARNATAKA
'-- BY ITS SECRETARY
'EDHCATION DEPARTMENT
M'."S.BUiLDING
V AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BANGALORE-01
DIRECTOR OF PRIMARY EDUCAWOES3
OFFICE OF COMMISSIONER
PUBLIC EDUCATION DEPARTMEEWT
NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BANGALORE~O 1
3 BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
scum RANGE-3
B P WADIA ROAD
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALGRE~»O4 J _
4 JINGLE BELLS
6m MAiN,9'1'I-I CROSS __
MICE) LAYOUT, BTM IISRAGE A
BANGALORE-76 '
8'1' ITS PRESXDENT * ;
SMT MAYURI PARMEsI¢;ARA_M...'*;%.REsPoix:ma;NTs
WRIT APPEAL FILE?) U.f.S;'4_ O§'»._TI-IE KARNATAKA
HEGH COURT AC? PRAYING 'To..»sET, A$3i§"JE THE ORIDER
PASSED IN T.H'Ev.._WE_?IT' P§j'I'ITi~€3N N<}.3?'02/O3 DATED
01/08/12008.3 2 '
This up for Preliminaxy Hearing on
this day,' SABHAHIT. J;,._.C1c1iV;:::I:d the following.
V. Vaggpammxr
by the fourth respondent in WP.
beixzvvggzaggxietvttd ‘by $13.6 erder {iatsd 1.8.2008
VV Singlat Judge has quashed the mtier
détteci passed by the thixd respondent in the writ
pefifiénsfilock Edzxcatien Oficcr pmhibifing the Writ
« ,petifibner fmvm naming kinde§g:ten«
Education Department started piessurisingii ‘s.i1}:u
petitioner to obtain 1’egist1’atio1:1:=.A: Iindéf
Education Act, 1983 as a ‘Privffat:: E9d}i¢ati0n«:’-Ii’ ;;§;gfit1;:ti;3:;’ .
and this was éone by the ‘1Vj}:1fiisu’:;§:nt to the
Government orcier datétgififi. 1 ohtained
registration fmm t’he activities of
tltm petiti-131161″ a Vi€’W net to
aritagonise ‘ meanwhile, fourth
msponfiéfii ” ihfgnfion starteci sending
ob}ecticv§Vi–:s” various authorities like
Education Depa11;1’;.1efx_t, Palikc, Police eta,
< to. the' V'f}eii%ioVner running the §}I'€~'}}I'i.Il1aIj,' school.
rfispondent along with ten others
a'pp§t§ac1§¢§§[i':_ court in W.P.No.2033'?'/2005 impleading
I'€Sp'(')11(1V"f2;f1"£§ 1, 2 and Bangaiore Mahanagara Palike. The
A C_"fii':i"i"ioner contested the petition by fiiing counter statement.
' Hiearneti Single Juége after hearing the parties allawed
" hghe Writ peiition and directed the petititmer to close down
their activities by the end of acadamic year 2006-200? by
u»''"'*
order dated 26.2.2007. The said order of Shiglé .
Judge was challenged in W.A.Nc::.'77£:3 / 2§){f§'?
appeal is admitted. The ieam::d_ Sing1eAJ::.dge sré}ii1'é:V"d'ispi;fléi1:g"'V _
of the writ petition (ii3"€Ctt'$€ii* Efififi to
reconsider the appficaficn fégistration
along with the objtecticifié V and to take
decision acco§J<*(ii£:¢;gL:V:'tr secondary school are 0113}; required to be
‘1feg1:§te1f:ci’A–é*;f1tIT:=fi9§erefcre, petitioner»-Institutien is taken out of
_V Bf the Kamataka Education Act and Ruics. The
” V,pv3Lit,io11ér was not aware of the circular and it came: to know
.’ same {hiring the pendency of writ aizrpeal before this
The third respondent issued notice to the petifioner
ané the fourth respondent for the purpose of holding an
W
12
prahibited fibm running pr!-:–pri,maxy school _
30.5.2007 keeping open all thé W!V(:§E’.’¥’1′.£;’!’€”31″,’flIi¢i)§1S.:A’V:uff)’i’:xVifflfiflii.
consicicration. Accotflingiy, {ha
Being aggzieved by the order
preferred W.P.No.3702v/3.008 by the
order of the leanzed Single this appeal.
9. It is g<:1rzia;*VVj'_£"roz1:§ order passed by
the 1c:amed Siz} 5gl<;:'1'1;§:1.dgé'.'ufvflziis in w.P.No.29337/2905
dated .1';liic:_.i%:aj:11ed Single Judge has in the
said oxtlézxfisfliiltit in pa1:a–33 atxd 34 of the order
datf<,§26'.~FZ.20€3'? that in View of the provisions of Section
%%e§;1e '2gb; of sub–S€c'£i0n 22 of Secticn 2 and the
L%"dc'géga7o:e:% »§*éfr"_v.V.1;_.i1§~?.;:"i§ivis3'.n Beach in Vifiyavardhaka S:-mgh vs.
Staffi of.f}i.ar1:liatai<a (ELR 2005 Karnataka 290?) helé that the
_ 'app¢l1ai1t..is an Educafional institution Inquiring ragistratien
' 'zmdcr the provisions of the Education Act. However, While
-»v(ii%sp0si11g of the W.A.N0.778/2907 on 16.1.2008 liberty has
V been given to the appeiiant to chalisenge the order dated
‘\.J~
‘$4
impugned order dated 3.0.5.200’? it Was_.fc1i.i§d.V V ‘age ~..
petitioner had not provided ne(£.5fssa:.a:y « £315
mmzing the pI~e-primary schr;»?<:1__a13d "tt:4é"concii"£:§1t};:§.$'_imficfiééd ,
While gzantiflg certificats of had
not been compiitci witil:-'_.'F=he a pre-
prixnary school V since order dated
306.200'? as;"iLi'1'«t.*:A;_c}x"cie1::;._ Single Judge
has been lixokiing that it maynot be
appmp 14i.é1'fe"_v to 1131} without any
descrififivfé in the Large interest of
kindcxfgafiéfi. s't13;c£¢11tAAs–._b'by ":<)1wc1c;' dated 25.9.2008 passed in
u _ Alihfififfilfi, unless the said defects as notfid in
L' ir;:pzig;'§éé:TG;Eder dated 3{}.:'"S,200'? am rectificd intsrest of
I<;l13.£ii<%e£rgai"ti:Vtr;V.;=51:1V,z<:!e11ts it would not be appmpriatcs: to permit
the fxcfifigfitér to run the prwpfimaxy school. Accerdingly, we
~ Ah:a:ii(1..¢&t§1:Vas¢t the petitioner shauld be permitted 2:0 mm a pit'
school only afisr the defects as Iloticed in the order
u Wdattzszi 30.5.2{)O?' am zwectifmesi and till then. the petitioner is
not entitled to run the ;3re~primary schcml.
15
With the above said modificafiozas ordgfiti” ..
passed by the learned Single Ji11u{ig§t.,.4 t;i1£$’:i¥-V3′
disposed of accordingly. ”
Chief T113110?
. .,§,_351.’3~{f5i: Yes} HQ): .V J