IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD Vi' DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF 'R * H BEFORE/"' THE HONBLE MR.JUSTICE1"C.R.R;KUMAR$§SWAN;?A..,\}j.. Cr1.P. g2AO09__ V Between: 1. sHRI.MAM00NRAsHID_ MoULAj:1AB PARATANALLI AgvAI,'3~TCIvI'I;._JUDGE SR.DN.&: ADDITIONAL CJM"'I.,IAMAI<_HAN.DI»__I'N_ ';I.AMAIRAYE13--_ FOR*~--IN THE APPLICATION FILED BY TI:gjE"RETIT1ONERs, AND ETC. ;"'TIIIi's«CRL. PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION ' TII.Is"vDAY;-T_H--E COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER
I “I”-i’his Criminai petition is filed under section 482
it “‘_VVO’1r{‘DI’.P.C:. by the advocate for the petitioner praying to
‘:set–aside (quash) the order dated 5.5.2009 passed by
{J7
the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn) 85 AddI..g””CgJM,
Jamakhandi, in Jamakhandi Town
Cr.No.8/199 (CC.18/2009) and furthegrgiitoigg’:fan’tiit11ie_d’
relief prayed for in the
petitioners.
2. I have heard ph§fiea1~nediicoucnssei for the
petitioners as Well as _
3. H for sometime.
During Sri.M.G.Naganuri,
the petitioners submits
that ‘he.g\in.tein’dsA:’i:’f’ci revision Petition before the
co;urtr..of challenging the impugned order
«t«da:.e;ij’p5§ig5;.2oo9 passed by the Principal Civil Judge
_ ‘{iSr.:Dij}l_§3a~ii.i’:;’Add}. CJM, Jamakhandi. In case if a
ruevisionpetition is filed before the court of sessions,
V ‘A the same shall be considered by the court of sessions
accordance with law. Therefore question of
considering the quashing of proceedings or setting
ax
aside the impugned order does not arise. The iiiterim
order granted earlier is vacated.
With this observation t1_i1is,_peti1;ib’ii”u”
of.
A
e”IU3GE
